Freezing to death: action highlights excess winter fuel deaths

Posted by John Sauven - 22 November 2011 at 12:45pm - Comments
fighting the freeze action outside parliament 2011
by. Credit: David Sandison / Greepeace
Activists create a living room outside of Parliament

This morning, outside of the Houses of Parliament, activists from both Greenpeace and the National Pensioners Convention undertook the first of what I hope will be many joint initiatives. With sofas and tables they created a life size living room, covered with frost to highlight the 25,700 excess winter deaths that were announced today.

The term excess really doesn’t do justice to the human tragedy of these lives lost. The elderly, the sick and the vulnerable are all victims of a domestic fuel pricing regime that leaves them with the dilemma of choosing between food and heat.

Today, Greenpeace and the NPC made two clear demands on George Osborne and this government to help alleviate the three million-plus pensioners who are now living in fuel poverty. The first is to reinstate the £600 million cut to the winter fuel allowance that will mean the over 80s will lose £100 and the under 80s £50. This cut is simply unjustifiable in the year that will see average domestic gas prices increase on average by over 16 per cent.

There’s another reason why the winter fuel payment should not be cut and that’s because it saves the country money. Presently the cost to the NHS of those who are treated for the effects of cold homes is £850 million. It defies logic to pay to treat the health impacts of people living in fuel poverty when we could use that expenditure to reduce the burden on the NHS.

There is another measure that George Osborne should take that would help those in fuel poverty, cut excess winter deaths and help generate growth in the economy and that would be to reinstate the £235 million cut in funding for insulation of homes under the Warm Front scheme.

The cut to the scheme defies economic and environmental logic. Insulating homes cuts fuel usage. Cutting fuel usage lowers bills. Cutting fuel usage cuts carbon emissions – very simply, investing to keep homes warm is a virtuous circle in which the consumer and the planet win. Yet this successful and vital policy is being cut.

And there’s a simple way to pay for this. As a result of the increases in domestic fuel prices, George Osborne will receive over £200 million extra in VAT revenues this year. He could use this windfall to reinstate the cuts he has made to Warm Front and help cut the costs of people’s domestic bills.

Today is the first step in what I hope will become a huge campaign to reduce fuel poverty, improve energy efficiency and cut the number of excess winter deaths. It is a campaign that offers real solutions based on economic fairness and environmental protection.

Email your MP, asking them to tell George Osborne that he needs to take urgent action to protect those at risk >>

The term Excess Winter Deaths is a simple stat that compares the Winter with an average of the previous Autumn and the following spring. This is a phenomena all over the world. More people die in the cold months.

I believe your article implies that all of these deaths are preventable and are prevenatble by Government policy. The report that generates this figure does not imply that and nor should you. Yes - the study beleives that various policies can make a difference but, while influenza still thrives in Winter and while people still go outside I'm afraid you will always get more deaths in the Winter. Seasonal death variations are not, therefore, any more a "human tragedy" than death itself which, to be honest, will happen to us all.

As I understand it these 'excess deaths' are related to cold houses, not simply a statsitical variation, and so yes we should be doing more to prevent them.

Cutting payments to the most vulnerable folk in our society is immoral, and insane as these costs will simply be shifted to the NHS - treating the consequences of those cuts.

Insulating homes, and making sure people have the money to heat them seems like common sense to me.

I signed your petition and posted it on my Facebook wall. A friend made similar points to the above. Can Greenpeace please respond to this? If they're missing the point I'd like to be able to explain it to them. Thank you.

@ Mykul & TRos

Thanks for your comments.

Some of these deaths are caused by elderly people not getting their flu jab - these are examples of deaths which could be prevented by a government policy making the jabs more widely known and more easily available. Some people die of hypothermia in their own houses. This is another example of deaths which could be prevented by government policy, specifically by installing better insulation and reinstating the winter fuel payment.

We are all going to die eventually, but I think it's fair to describe a pensioner dying of hypothermia because
they can't afford to heat their badly-insulated home as a 'human tragedy'. I can't quite see how that could be in any way controversial, unless tragedies only happen to the young.

John neither said nor implied that restoring the winter fuel allowance and funding for the Warm Front scheme would prevent every single one of these 25,700 excess deaths, he said that it would "cut the number of excess winter deaths". There's no need for you to try to infer hidden meanings - the text is quite clear.

I hope that's helpful.

Hi Mykul and TRos

Recent analysis in the Government commissioned Hills Fuel Poverty Review states that "recent analysis attributes about a fifth of excess winter deaths to living in cold homes". It further states that  "Living in cold homes has a series of effects on illness and mental health. But at the top of the iceberg of these effects is the way in which Britain has unusually high rates of ‘excess winter deaths’."

It gives a further breakdown of how many of these deaths from cold homes are due to being in fuel poverty and says that "even if, on a conservative estimate, only a tenth of excess winter deaths are linked to cold indoor temperatures caused by fuel poverty, this is more than the level of fatal road accidents."

So this certainly is an avoidable human tragedy and one that urgently needs to be addressed. We are calling on the Chancellor to reverse the cuts in Winter Fuel Payments and the Warm Front energy efficiency scheme to help make homes warm and protect lives this winter.

You can read the Hills' Fuel Poverty Review here: http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/funding-support/fuel-poverty/3226-...

Follow Greenpeace UK