Search
GP Worldwide
RSS
Creative Commons
TAKE ACTION
Recent entries
- Amazon deforestation gets the Panorama treatment
- Meeting with the makers of palm oil
- Kingsnorth trial day five: a short update
- Stansted: how you can help to stop BAA's expansion plans
- Kingsnorth trial day four: Zac Goldsmith appears for the defence
- Kingsnorth trial day three: world's leading climate scientist gives evidence
- Rainforest timber shipment blocked in Papua New Guinea
- Fires raging through the Amazon
- Kingsnorth trial day two
- Can cutting down forests affect deep water fish?
China gives inefficient bulbs the boot
Posted by jamie on 4 October 2007.
I had one of those meetings this morning where I was doodling on my notebook rather than listening as attentively as perhaps I should have been, but the words 'China', 'light' and 'bulbs' caught my attention. I started paying even more attention when I realised it related to the news that China will be phasing out incandescent bulbs in the next 10 years.
Wow. The most populous nation on the planet with (arguably) the largest carbon dioxide emissions is going to get rid of inefficient lighting by 2017, or thereabouts. Details are sketchy - Reuters is carrying the story - and searching Google News and Technorati reveals that not too many people have picked up on it yet.
But the implications are pretty staggering. When folks in rich nations whine that there's no point reducing emissions because the booming economies in China and India will swamp any cuts made, I can now point to an example where at least one of those countries is steaming ahead of the US, the EU and, of course, the UK. Greenpeace India is working on their government, so hopefully we'll see similar news from there in the near future.
China is the first developing country to sign up to a light bulb programme established by the Global Environment Facility. I hadn't heard of this particular organisation before but perhaps that's not surprising - according to Reuters, it's "one of the richest and least-known environmental funding agencies worldwide." Monique Barbut, chief executive officer of the facility, says it means China will save the equivalent of roughly half of Germany's annual emissions.
Ten years sounds a lot compared to our own government's drive to phase out incandescents by the end of 2011, but their plan is only voluntary. So by 2017, we could well see inefficient bulbs on sale in those UK shops that haven't volunteered to get rid of them, whereas China will be completely incandescent-free. Oh, the shame.



aircraft pollution
I live 15 miles from Gatwick. When I got up this morning there was a huge stench of aviation fuel in the air. This happens often and must cover a huge area. An aircraft had dumped it’s fuel prior to landing. Is this safe? Does anyone know what the health and environmental risks are?
Release of 'ambient' chemicals
Did you know that Rentokil have started a new service where they install spraying equipment into Clubs, Pubs Hotels Restaurants etc which pump man made perfumes in the air to create an ’ambience’? These chemicals contain oil based solvents like toluene.
Is this safe? I wonder what tests have been done. Why should I be subjected to these potentially dangerous chemicals if I stay a hotel or go to the pub?. Will there be notices warning us of this hazard?
???
Re: aircraft pollution
Thanks for your comments. Our climate campaigners would be very interested to talk you about the dumping of aviation fuel at Gatwick. Please drop Louise a line at webteam@uk.greenpeace.org - she'll be all ears!