Going beyond oil is also about peace

Posted by jamess - 2 October 2010 at 4:11pm - Comments

Everyone’s got their personal reasons for taking action. For me, deciding to jump in front of a moving drill ship was not only about protecting the environment and stopping climate change, it was also about peace. Our addiction to oil fuels conflict, corrupts governments and destroys lives.

I grew up in a house that was half-British and half-Iranian, with each blaming the other for pretty much everything.  From imperialism to bad food, the list was never-ending, symptoms of an unhappy marriage using cultural difference to fight petty arguments.

There was, however, one story that kept coming up, over and over again.  It went back to the 1950’s – long before I was born - and it was to do with BP and oil.

BP at that time was known as the Anglo-Iranian oil company, though a year later it would change its name to British Petroleum.  In Iran, the company was happy to have its acronym misunderstood as “Benzin-e Pars”, which literally translates to Iranian Petrol.

BP was then running the world’s biggest oil refinery at Abadan port on the Persian Gulf, extracting, refining and exporting the oil while giving only 16% of the profits to the Iranians – and even that after an opaque accounting process.

But the early 50’s saw a worldwide movement for decolonisation and independence. The Iranians started to push harder for a fairer deal for ‘their’ oil, and BP and the British government were getting worried.

Oil was – and still is today – a security issue. As a limited resource vital for military industries and the fuel on which our economies, as presently constructed, are designed to run, politicians will do almost anything to secure a guaranteed and cheap oil lifeline.

So in the summer of 1953, when Mohammad Mossadegh - the democratic leader of Iran - was calling for nationalisation of the country’s oil, BP and the UK government decided that wasn’t an option. It was time to get rid of him and replace him with a pliant dictator.

Well that was my mum’s side of the argument anyway. And I spent much of my life dismissing it as a one-sided view of history, or just another way to blame my dad.

It was only when key documents got declassified later that we all learned that she was right.

BP and the UK government persuaded US President Eisenhower to use his recently formed CIA to topple the Iranian prime minister. The idea was to replace Mossadegh with a monarchy. One that would do BP and the UK government’s bidding and keep the oil flowing, cheap and constant.

As the very first in a long line of CIA coups, ‘Operation Ajax’ as it was known in the US or ‘Operation Boot’ in the UK, reads like something out of a spy novel. It involved briefcases full of cash, paid thugs and rent-a-mob crowds who were organised to mobilise outside the Prime Minister’s residence on the day of the overthrow.

This was all happening around the corner from my great-aunt’s house, where my mum was staying at the time.  She talks about the gunfire, looting and stories of torture that were being whispered around later that evening. She also nervously remembers the house being ransacked, while police looked for a rug portrait of Mossadegh, which fortunately someone managed to hide up a garden tree.

Millions were affected by those events in 1953 and the repercussions lasted for decades – in fact they’re still being felt.

When I was born, in 1979, the streets outside our window were pulsing with revolution – an uprising that had its roots in the oil coup.  The monarchy that had been put in place in 1953 had become brutally repressive and – unsurprisingly – much of the blame was put on the UK and US governments who had put them there.  As a consequence of the social upheaval following the revolution my family had to leave Iran and came eventually to settle in the UK.

1953 was a long time ago, and neither the government politicians nor the BP executives are the same as those who toppled Iran’s democracy for the sake of cheap oil.

But the country of my birth and the wider region that I love continues to be ravaged by oil wars and destabilised by our global addiction to the dirty fuel.  And it’s not just the Middle East. From Kyrgyzstan to the Niger Delta, there’s a repeating pattern of oil and conflict.  Where large oil companies can manipulate fragile political systems they often do, leaving untold millions the worse for it.

So for me it’s personal. For the sake of the climate, the environment and for peace, I say we should go beyond oil now.

-- James on the Esperanza

Photo of Gannets and Gulls flying above the Esperanza © Will Rose / Greenpeace

I never normally comment on online articles, but after reading your post I just thought I'd say thanks for giving us such a nicely written, thoughtful article. It's nice to be reminded of the "peace" part of the Greenpeace name, and to remember that peace and environmental issues are so intrinsically linked.

This provides a fascinating insight into the root cause of why our global economy is unsustainable. Governments are more interested in fighting for power then cooperating for peace. This blog outlines the insanity of governments sitting around a table supposedly to agree a treaty to share the atmosphere when many of them are still bombing each other: http://ecohustler.co.uk/2010/08/15/peace-or-die/

This is such a relevant, interesting and, may I say, well written piece - fascinating personal connection with the events of the Mosssadeq overthrow that the author has. My eye was caught by a link to this piece in a Twitter re-post, as I've just fixed up a graphic fusing a wind-turbine and the Nuke Disarmament symbol (that was prompted by a Yahoo article on the origins of the CND symbol with hundreds of comments which mostly disparaged it as a kind of rune involved with satanism etc etc). I could'nt believe that the concepts hadn't been linked b4, so I posted using a fresh Avatar with 1st draft (approx comment no. 550) - and did a slightly better version on my FB wall, (name "Chelim Yrneh") Pl feel free to improve it - and adapt ... All power to your biceps aand bilge-pumps, Regards, Chel @forthesapcemen on Twitter

... er, symbol fusing wind power and NukeDisarmament - not runes & satanism ! @forthespacemen

please note the link " Sam" posted in the above comment is not connected to Greenpeace.

I'm a big supporter of Greenpeace's work, but sometimes i feel that there is too much emphasis on the green, and not enough on the peace. For me the two are intrinsically linked - and it was great to read this post that reminded us of that link. Stopping climate change and environmental damage is important not just for the sake of the polar bears or the planet in itself, but for sake of the millions of human beings who also suffer from the effects of our addiction to oil. I think people remember those affected by climate change first - Bangladeshis whose water sources are becoming saline and whose homes are damaged by cyclones, and the people of countries such as Mali who are being affected by increased desertification and drought. But we sometimes forget the people of Iraq, Iran and Nigeria, and elsewhere, who have suffered human rights abuses on a great scale because we are prepared to turn a blind eye to these crimes in order to fulfill our thirst for the black liquid. Going beyond oil in itself won't solve these problems of course - we need a greater commitment to transparency and human rights standards to do that - but it's a good place to start. Thanks again for the post.

Thanks for pointing this out Jo. I've deleted the offending post in line with our 'house rules.'

NB Any posts containing spam advertising links will be deleted immediately without notification, and the poster's account will also be deleted.

Follow Greenpeace UK