The one bank we really should be saving

Posted by jamess — 17 December 2010 at 11:17am - Comments

HBOS? Bailed. Lloyds TSB? Done. RBS? I'll get my chequebook. Green Investment Bank? Erm, no thanks.

The only bailing being done by today's government is on its green promises, and one stands out bigger than the rest: the commitment to establish a Green Investment Bank.

Back in November last year, as part of a newly rebranded Conservative party – green tree on the letterhead, huggable huskies in the Arctic, pedal-powered commutes to parliament – George Osborne, now the Chancellor, said this:

"If we're to compete in the technologies of the future, and come out of this recession with a more balanced economy, then Britain needs to play catch up. Our Green Investment Bank will help us do precisely that. It will help deliver the green finance we need for new growth and new jobs in every region of the country. And it will help us to decarbonise our economy and compete for business around the world."

Hear hear George. Or more accurately: hear hear "George 2009".

Last month after we posted a little reminder of his pledge on the Treasury he quipped: "it's the first anyone has ever protested for a bank". Well, that's because it appears he's finding his promises hard to keep.

On Wednesday, Chris Huhne, George's Lib Dem opposite number at the Department for Energy and Climate Change, suggested that there may not be a Green Investment Bank after all. There may be a fund instead. A fund that last month we said would amount to little more than a "poorly funded government quango".

What's the government finding so difficult to understand about the Green Bank? It'll stimulate innovation and growth in the clean energy sector and the economy more widely. It'll create tens of thousands of jobs. It'll help us hit our emissions targets.

Apparently that's not enough. It seems the coalition's green pledge is flaking away like cheap paint.

Huhne says "the overwhelming priority of the government has to be to keep the deficit down." Yet this bank can stimulate growth in the economy that will help pay off the deficit. The two are not contradictory.

As Climate Change Secretary, Huhne's 'overwhelming priority' should be to stop climate change, which is precisely the basis on which he was in Cancun last week. But where's the point in negotiating international pledges if you can't even keep your promises at home? Ernst & Young's say that without a bank, we'll have only about a fifth of the £450bn needed for us to hit our emissions targets over the next 15 years.

It's still not too late for the government to set its priorities straight and commit to establishing a Green Investment Bank – not a fund – that has serious start-up funding and the power to raise its own cash.

Until it does, it'll be clear that mixing blue and yellow doesn't give you green. 

Not to fund the Geen Bank is brainless. Contact your MP to put pressure on the Energy Bill and get the bank funded and working. If they can fund all the commercial Banks why not the Green Bank?

@James, @Jerome, @Tim, and @Wirocu thanks for the comments - all spot on. There is no rational basis for not supporting a strong and independent Green Bank.

@Wirocu we haven't got an automated email setup this time (if you remember we did a similar action back in October) but it would be great if you contacted your own MPs and told them how passionately you feel about this issue. Sometimes a handful of personal emails can trump a mass barrage for effectiveness. Check out http://www.writetothem.com/ to find your MP and email them.

@David, nice blog, thanks :)

Sorry Bill, they must have been deleted by mistake. As you may have noticed, we're having some problems with spam comments; coupled with a new website with new comment moderation facilities which we're still getting to grips with, a few genuine comments have been deleted in error.

I'm very sorry about this but please feel free to repost your comments.

Jamie

Follow Greenpeace UK