Revealed: the businesses blocking European climate ambitions

Posted by tracy.frauzel - 18 May 2011 at 12:30pm - Comments
All rights reserved. Credit: Dirven/Greenpeace

Businesses hold a huge sway over our governments. Stating the bleeding obvious, I know. So it’s probably not surprising that some major companies are lobbying to sabotage efforts to improve European climate targets.

But, we now have the evidence to name and shame some of these companies and associations publicly. Some of the companies we know that are holding back European climate ambitions are Volkswagen, Microsoft, BP, Maersk, Veolia and Accenture.

Right now executives from these companies are being locked out of the major European Business Summit 2011, by more than 170 Greenpeace activists.

The volunteers are dressed in business suits and are using modified briefcases to secure themselves to the conference centre entrances and close them off.

These shameless companies are trying to hold back environment ministers from increasing the EU target for carbon emissions reductions from 20% to 30% by 2020, even though we are already on track to make the 20% reduction because of the recession. Also, a 30% reduction would be easy for Europe to achieve while bringing us a step closer to the 40% target scientists recommend.

The European business lobby is split with some impressive corporations in favour of the increased targets for emission reductions - including giants Unilever, Google, Phillips, BSkyB, Vodafone and Tesco. They argue that cutting European emissions would boost green investment that will help Europe compete with countries like the US and China in clean energy technologies.

Other big brands, including Scottish and Southern, Sainsbury’s, IKEA, MANGO and the PPR Group (with a portfolio of brands that includes Puma and Gucci), have also recently joined the movement of businesses who want to see more ambition from Europe in building a greener economy.

 

Politicians are now feeling the sway. Seven EU ministers are also supporting stronger carbon emissions cuts including the UK which just yesterday committed to carbon emissions cuts of 50% by 2025 in line with the independent climate change committee recommendations.

There are many reasons for European businesses to support more ambitious targets. The new target would boost clean energy investment, create millions of new jobs and make Europe more competitive with China. And, more importantly, it would take us a step closer to beating climate change and ensure that they can continue to enjoy good business in the future - longterm.

The dirty businesses just need to get out of the way.

Help us name and shame these companies by sharing them on Facebook and Twitter today - use the share buttons just to the left.

Find out more about climate and European carbon emissions cuts:

Well said,

It's a case of money vs. sense here and since sense dosn't bail out failing economies then it's sad to say, but money wins most of the time.

I find it irritating that there are STILL people who don't believe in manmade harmful climate change and it's mostly down to these people in big buisiness throwing money around to get people to downplay the problem and tell people it's "only a theory". 

The European business lobby is split with some impressive corporations being in favour of the increased emissions - including giants Unilever, Google, Phillips, BSkyB, Vodafone and Tesco. They argue that cutting European emissions would boost green investment that will help Europe compete with countries like the US and China in clean energy technologies.

This doesn't make sense. Are these companies in faviour of INCREASED EMISSIONS or not - I can't tell from your text.

Seems from the chart that any company associated with a business confederation  is being labelled a laggard by default.  But are their Green credentials any better or worse?  It wasn't clear from the descriptions on the chart.  Isn't it more important to know what they do on climate change rather than who they talk to? 

@Sarah JJJL - you are right, mistake on my part. They are in favour of increased TARGETS on emissions reductions. Thanks.

The other Gordon - the pdf document may do a better job of explaining why we've singled out these companies for blocking progess on European emissions targets: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/greece/external_projects/beauty_beast/briefs/Laggards_Profiled.pdf

I'm slightly confused and worried that Microsoft are mentioned as one of the baddies, the other companies doesn't come as a great surprise. I had the understanding that Bill Gates were one of the people to speak up and financially support climate change and as the head of Microsoft I would have thought the same counted for them. Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Bill Gates one of the investors that went against prop 23 the movement that tried to rule against California's tough climate change law and therefore were part of the reason it was overturned?

I like the naming and shaming of the companies who in the name of CSR, and corporate spin, boast of their green credentials, while behind the scenes they pay lobbyists to stop any climate protetcting legislation that might possibly have a short term impact on their profits.

Climate legislation IMO, in the long term, does more to protect their profits than any other form of buisness deal. Along with protecting human civilisation, the natural environment, and of course the lives of countless millions (and billions) of people who live on planet Earth.

As to Microsoft being one of the badies, well it doesn't suprise me, and @anders79 check out that pdf (and briefing above). It's not the most comprehensive in the world, but seems to be a good starting point.

go greenpeace! Woo!

Follow Greenpeace UK