Rock with Live Earth, take action on climate change

Posted by jamie — 6 July 2007 at 6:38pm - Comments
Save the planet

With 2 billion pairs of eyes expected to be firmly clamped on the Live Earth concerts tomorrow, the word about climate change will be spread far and wide. Although, as George Marshall argues, perhaps enough people already know and they're just waiting to be forced into doing something about it through new laws introduced by their government.

We don't have to wait, though - in fact, we can't wait. Even the most optimistic predictions about the effects of climate change say that we need to take immediate action. So if watching Madonna cavorting around has spurred you on, what can you do here and now? Funny you should ask...

  • Change your light bulbs. It's a small thing but if everyone in the UK did it, we could get rid of two medium-sized power stations. The old complaints that energy efficient bulbs aren't as good as traditional ones just don't hold water anymore, so why are power crazy bulbs still being sold?
  • That's another thing you can do - write to your supermarket or DIY shop, asking them to commit to removing inefficient light bulbs from their shelves. Not in five years time like the government wants, but now.
  • We should also ask why proposals are being made for new coal-fired power stations. One is being considered right now by Medway Council in Kent - write to them and explain why it really wouldn't be a good idea to build the first one for 30 years.
  • But it's not just about saying no to bad energy, it's about shouting hooray for good energy. Find out how we can bridge the energy gap, not with coal or nuclear power, but with renewables and decentralised energy - look, we made a video about it.
  • Sign up for our ebulletin. We'll keep you posted on new ideas about how we can all work together and lick this climate change business.

If we combine the potential for CHP on industrial sites and in communities then, according to government figures, we could generate more than double the expected output of electricity from the proposed nuclear programme - in the same time frame, for less money and without the legacy of nuclear waste.

Added to that are massive savings to be made from generating heat alongside electricity (piping heat from a smaller, ultra-efficient CHP unit within a town cuts heating bills and provides a local source of heating and electricity in the most efficient way possible). In Southampton for example, thousands of homes and many large businesses save both money and emissions by being part of the heat network and supplied by local CHP plants. (Other cities like London and Birmingham have similar developments and plans, and on an even larger scale.)

And the potential for industrial CHP in the UK is mind-boggling. If we installed CHP plants on just a relatively small number of industrial sites in the UK, they'd generate the same amount of electricity as the all the proposed new nuclear reactors combined. And they could be built in just a few years (much quicker than nuclear), would provide heat as well as electricity and (based on the reported investment at Immingham CHP plant) would cost a fraction of the price of new nukes (pdf).

By the way, we've just made a new film about nuclear power vs CHP, efficiency and renewables - and there's lots more info about CHP here.

Cheers,

Bex
gpuk

If we combine the potential for CHP on industrial sites and in communities then, according to government figures, we could generate more than double the expected output of electricity from the proposed nuclear programme - in the same time frame, for less money and without the legacy of nuclear waste. Added to that are massive savings to be made from generating heat alongside electricity (piping heat from a smaller, ultra-efficient CHP unit within a town cuts heating bills and provides a local source of heating and electricity in the most efficient way possible). In Southampton for example, thousands of homes and many large businesses save both money and emissions by being part of the heat network and supplied by local CHP plants. (Other cities like London and Birmingham have similar developments and plans, and on an even larger scale.) And the potential for industrial CHP in the UK is mind-boggling. If we installed CHP plants on just a relatively small number of industrial sites in the UK, they'd generate the same amount of electricity as the all the proposed new nuclear reactors combined. And they could be built in just a few years (much quicker than nuclear), would provide heat as well as electricity and (based on the reported investment at Immingham CHP plant) would cost a fraction of the price of new nukes (pdf). By the way, we've just made a new film about nuclear power vs CHP, efficiency and renewables - and there's lots more info about CHP here. Cheers, Bex gpuk

About Jamie

I'm a forests campaigner working mainly on Indonesia. My personal mumblings can be found @shrinkydinky.

Follow Greenpeace UK