Safety first: India gives Monsanto a moratorium

Posted by saunvedan - 12 February 2010 at 1:03pm - Comments

The humble aubergine has been the staple of Indian cuisine since antiquity. I can tell you that as I’ve grown up trying to avoid it, but eventually it just makes its way on your dinner plate if you spend time in India. The Americans, who like to call the aubergine ‘eggplant’ are trying to sell Bacillus thuringiensis (BT) bacterium Brinjal to Indians citing increased yields and the usual propaganda associated with genetically modified crops. Honestly though, anything injected with any kind of ‘bacterium’ doesn’t really sound safe, does it?

Greenpeace India raised the alarm and legally challenged the American biotechnology firm Monsanto over the claimed safety of BT Brinjal. Monsanto was then forced to allow tests to be carried out which were conducted by Gilles-Eric Seralini of the University of Caen. The tests on rats showed that those given the genetically modified food had signs of liver and kidney damage. The toxic food also affected female rats by raising their blood sugar levels and also levels of triglycerides which are fatty substances in the body.

So, in a laudable move, Indian environment minister Jairam Ramesh has shown some resolve and courage by imposing an indefinite moratorium on the release of BT brinjal. He cited dangers to human health and the environment were responsible for his decision after a consensus with a number of Indian states to test public opinion. Nobody wants to eat a genetically modified crop when nature has provided us with plenty and without any toxins. For millennia, human civilization has subsisted perfectly well without any genetic modifications, so why now?

Could the author of this piece confirm the Serlaini report please. The only relevant reference on Pubmed relates to corn/maize, not aubergines, and involves analysis of pre-existing data rather than conducting tests (Int J Biol Sci.;5(7):706-26). thanks

Hi pilgrim7 - I've gone back to check the original source material and it seems that you're right that Dr Seralini did not conduct the original research into the Bt brinjal aubergine. His role was in the

"analysis of the research data on the country's first transgenic vegetable, the Bt brinjal, [which] was presented to the Supreme Court. He said the tests conducted by Mahyco, the company producing the Bt brinjal, were simply not valid and raised serious health concerns." [Full text here]

So sorry for that. Nevertheless the wider point made in this blog remains completely valid - Dr Seralini did conduct analysis of why the Mahyco aubergine tests were invalid. You can download a copy of his findings here. (PDF format)

Apologies for any confusion caused.

Joss
GPUK webteam

Thank you for the prompt clarification, and the further references.
I am not sure I agree with the reading of what the piece's wider point may be. But in any case, the position seems to be that, whilst Dr Seralini has raised serious questions on the research that purported to demonstrate the safety of Bt Brinjal, he has not published research evidencing adverse effects on rats (or indeed humans). It would be true to say however that he has argued for further research, which is hard to disagree with.

Could the author of this piece confirm the Serlaini report please. The only relevant reference on Pubmed relates to corn/maize, not aubergines, and involves analysis of pre-existing data rather than conducting tests (Int J Biol Sci.;5(7):706-26). thanks

Hi pilgrim7 - I've gone back to check the original source material and it seems that you're right that Dr Seralini did not conduct the original research into the Bt brinjal aubergine. His role was in the

"analysis of the research data on the country's first transgenic vegetable, the Bt brinjal, [which] was presented to the Supreme Court. He said the tests conducted by Mahyco, the company producing the Bt brinjal, were simply not valid and raised serious health concerns." [Full text here]

So sorry for that. Nevertheless the wider point made in this blog remains completely valid - Dr Seralini did conduct analysis of why the Mahyco aubergine tests were invalid. You can download a copy of his findings here. (PDF format)

Apologies for any confusion caused.

Joss
GPUK webteam

Thank you for the prompt clarification, and the further references. I am not sure I agree with the reading of what the piece's wider point may be. But in any case, the position seems to be that, whilst Dr Seralini has raised serious questions on the research that purported to demonstrate the safety of Bt Brinjal, he has not published research evidencing adverse effects on rats (or indeed humans). It would be true to say however that he has argued for further research, which is hard to disagree with.

Follow Greenpeace UK