About a week ago the Home Office alerted on the risk of nuclear threats in the short term from "rogue states or terrorist group".
Is it just a coincidence or does it really sound like a good trick to justify the huge spending on nuclear deterrent?
About a week ago the Home Office alerted on the risk of nuclear threats in the short term from "rogue states or terrorist group".
Is it just a coincidence or does it really sound like a good trick to justify the huge spending on nuclear deterrent?
Interested in helping with our campaigns, but not sure what’s involved?
Help and FAQThe Get Active section of our website is updated by Greenpeace volunteers and reflects their passionate and personal opinions.
More about Get Active
Comments