Search
GP Worldwide
RSS
Creative Commons
TAKE ACTION
Latest news
Fake triggers to start real wars
Posted by saunvedan on 4 August 2008.
We're called Greenpeace for a reason. Not only do we defend the natural world but also promote world peace. Hence, the Bush administration is a major cause for concern; it clashes with both of our objectives by trashing the environment and warmongering.
As if the wars on Afghanistan and invasion of Iraq weren't enough, the bloodthirsty US government looks desperate to wage war on Iran - even if that means staging an incident to start it, as you'll see from this video.
Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh reveals one disturbing proposal, discussed in Vice President Dick Cheney's office, that might make you question the Bush administration's credibility (if you haven't already).
Read more »Don't panic: Bush has a cunning climate plan
Posted by bex on 18 April 2008.
Less than a year after the IPCC warned the world that global emissions need to peak within the next 10 years (and then fall sharply), Bush - with much fanfare - has unveiled his new, cunning climate change plan: emit more for the next 17 years, and make sure developing countries help pay for what the US and the industrialised world has already emitted.
His address yesterday came during the latest Major Emitters Meeting - a series of meetings set up by Bush to undermine run in parallel to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change process (the UN's process being inconvenient because it wants mandatory rather than voluntary emissions targets, and says the industrialised world should bear the burden of responsibility for historical emissions).
Heading for hell and high water in the US
Posted by jamie on 30 January 2008.
US climate change policy will deliver hell and high water
© Greenpeace/Bill Auth
Last night, a day after George Bush's final State of the Union speech, Greenpeace volunteers in the US used one of their nation's most iconic monuments to paint a clear picture of what his climate change policies will mean for the planet.
Read more »Leaked Bali document reveals U.S. efforts to sink new global climate agreement
An extraordinary document leaked to Greenpeace in Bali this evening reveals that the United States is trying to destroy international efforts to tackle climate change.
The Bush Administration is trying to insert text into the Bali agreement that would make the next phase of Kyoto a voluntary – as opposed to legally binding - agreement. At present Kyoto signatories are subject to mandatory emissions cuts.
If the United States succeeds tonight, the post-2012 agreement will allow any nation to opt out and continue to pollute with abandon. This would take efforts to defeat climate change back to where they were in 1994, after which it was accepted that only mandatory cuts would work.
Greenpeace UK executive director John Sauven said:
"This is an extraordinary attempt by the Bush administration to kill off the international fight against climate change. If they get this text through the conference then the next treaty won’t be worth the paper it’s written on because it will give a free pass to any nation that wants to keep polluting. History will not forgive the Bush Administration for what it has tried to do in Bali. Gordon Brown should get on the phone to the White House and say enough’s enough, the world will not stand for this."
The proposed U.S. text includes the words 'as appropriate' 'depending' and 'may' in reference to emissions cuts, making any agreement voluntary. If accepted by other nations these words would make the post-2012 agreement a toothless treaty which could be legally ignored by all signatories.
The leaked text, currently being presented to a meeting of the Friends of the President (including the UK delegation) in Bali, reads as follows (voluntary language in bold):
THE TEXT
(b) enhanced action on mitigation of climate change, and the means to recognise such action, in the context of sustainable development, including, inter alia, consideration of:
(i) effective, measurable and reportable domestic mitigation actions,
[DEPENDING on the level of economic development and significance] [DEPENDING on the level of economic development and GHG contributions][ DEPENDING on the level of economic development and energy utilisation][in accordance with the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and responsive capabilities]:
(a) including, AS APPROPRIATE, quantified national emission limitation and reduction objectives, taking into account national circumstances and relative level of efforts;
(b) including, AS APPROPRIATE, domestic plans and measures that MAY include binding, market-based and sectoral programs; and
(c) supported, AS APPROPRIATE, by external technology, financing and capacity building.
For more information, contact Greenpeace on 07801 212967.
Beating about the bush, yet again
Posted by jamie on 1 October 2007.
So, no surprises last week as George Bush's climate change summit ended up being pretty much what everyone expected it would - a futile and elitist talking shop which was a vain attempt for the outgoing president (15 months and counting) to say that he 'did something' about climate change.
Read more »Bush speech - Greenpeace response
Responding to George Bush's speech at the Major Economies Meeting on Energy Security and Climate Change in Washington today (28th September), John Sauven, Executive director of Greenpeace UK said:
"We have 100 months for global CO2 emissions to peak and then start declining rapidly. Bush's attempt to derail the UN process must not be allowed to succeed. Voluntary goals set on a national basis are absolutely useless at delivering the kind of global emissions cuts needed to tackle climate change. George Bush has been forced to accept that climate change is the biggest issue in town – but we've yet to see any action from the US that matches the either scale of the threat or the obese size of their own CO2 emissions."
For more information please contact the Greenpeace Press Office on 0207 865 8255.
Bush climate conference: Greenpeace reaction
President George Bush has today invited representatives of major industrialised and developing countries to a 'climate change summit' in September. Reacting to the news, Greenpeace's senior climate campaigner Robin Oakley said:
"It's a step forward that Bush no longer denies man-made global warming, but there has to be a concern that this is yet another attempt to derail the UN climate change negotiations set for December in Indonesia. Bush speaks about aspirational goals and voluntary targets. That's his vision and it's just not serious.
"Gordon Brown must not allow Bush to distract the UN from December's meeting, where the goal must be the kind of deep binding emissions cuts that Bush still strongly opposes. That's the only way we'll keep temperature rises below two degrees centigrade, beyond which we face dangerous climate change.
"If Gordon Brown goes to Washington he should tell the president that the UN is the only place to agree a successor to Kyoto, and that the UN process will go ahead with or without this lame duck White House. As it is, Brown could more productively use his time there meeting Bush's likely successors, all of whom are serious about fighting climate change."
At the 2007 G8 meeting in Germany, Bush agreed that his conference would contribute to the wider UN effort, but this is not credible while he still opposes binding international targets.
The president, who plans to address the conference on September 27 and 28, sent invitations to the European Union, the European Commission, France, Germany, Italy, Britain, Japan, China, Canada, India, Brazil, South Korea, Mexico, Russia, Australia, Indonesia, South Africa and the United Nations.
ENDS
Greenpeace press office: 020 7865 8255
Weasel words and hot air
Posted by bex on 7 June 2007.
It was a bad day for the fight against climate change. The G8 has met and published their deal (pdf) and, despite the spin, it wasn't the deal the world needs.
Read more »G8 deal - Greenpeace response
Reacting to today's G8 agreement on climate change, Greenpeace UK director John Sauven said:
"George Bush's final gift to Blair falls short of what was needed to protect the climate. An agreement without targets is barely worth the paper it's written on."
He continued: "Bush says the US will 'seriously consider' substantial long term cuts in greenhouse gas emissions, but that's like saying aid to Africa is a good thing then refusing to actually commit to donating a single dollar."
He added:
"Scientists tell us we need to slash emissions over the next decade if we're to have a chance of preventing dangerous climate change. This document acknowledges the seriousness of the situation then ducks reality by offering weasel words like 'seriously considering', as if this was an after dinner discussion rather than the most important issue facing the world."
The document can be read here (pdf).
For more information, contact the Greenpeace press office – 0207 865 8255
G8: the story so far
Posted by bex on 7 June 2007.

UPDATE - 12.40pm: There have been boat chases and arrests near the G8, as Greenpeace inflatables entered the exclusion zone.
After a week of farcical manoeuvrings and diversions in the run up to the G8, today’s the day of reckoning; this afternoon, Angela Merkel, George Bush, Tony Blair et al will sit down in Heiligendamm to talk about climate change. The interplay of power between them will help determine if, how and when climate change is seriously tackled by the world’s most polluting countries.
Read more »

