What you can do
- Tell world leaders Copenhagen wasn't good enough for the climate
- Call for an end to investment in Trident
- Design an activist stronghold to stop the third runway at Heathrow
- Tell your MP to change the politics and save the climate
- Become a member of Airplot and stand in the way of a third runway
- Make a donation - we can't do it without your help
Does rice really need to be genetically modified?
Posted by christian on 16 April 2009.
The Philippine rice terraces, a UNESCO Living Cultural
Heritage site, has been declared a genetically-modified organism (GMO)
free zone
In the world of food staples, rice has a pretty iconic status. Over half of the global population eat it every day. It has been grown around the world for over 10,000 years. It's cultivated in 113 countries. If rice was a pop group, it would be the Beatles.
Read more »GM rice contamination reaches the UK
Posted by jamie on 5 September 2006.

Greenpeace has discovered illegal GM (Genetically Modified) rice from China has contaminated food products brought in the UK.
Illegal, genetically modified (GM) rice - unapproved for human consumption and containing a toxin that may cause allergic reactions in humans - has been found in food products in the UK, Germany and France.
Genetically engineered rice: illegal and unwanted in China
Summary
Greenpeace has discovered that GE rice seeds have been sold and grown commercially for a number of years. The GE rice is illegal, and has not been approved as safe for either human consumption or the environment. It has entered the Chinese food chain and environment, and may have contaminated Chinese rice exports.
GM Golden Rice is no response to world hunger
Publication date: June 2000
Summary
Developing a new variety of rice would not tackle the key cause of vitamin A deficiency. The real causes of hunger and malnutrition are poverty, poor food distribution, lack of land and resources to grow food, and a failure of political will. Experience with 'green revolution' crop varieties suggests that their introduction often results in the use of expensive external inputs - fertilisers and chemical pesticides, without which the crops fail. So for poor people who have land, vitamin A rice might not be of any benefit at all even if companies like Astra-Zeneca give Third World farmers free access to the grain.
The myth of Golden Rice debunked
Publication date: February 2001
Summary
"The public relations' uses of Golden Rice have gone too far. The industry's advertisements and the media in general seem to forget that it is a research product that needs considerable further development before it will be available to farmers and consumers."
According to its developers, 'Golden Rice' will not be available for local planting until 2005 at the earliest. Other scientists point out that proper research and testing would probably take much longer. There are no published studies about human health, socio-economic and environment impacts. It is also uncertain if the traits engineered in the 'Golden Rice' would be 'stable', or if they could be 'silenced' by local environmental conditions.
Correspondence from The Rockefeller Foundation
Publication date: February 2001
Summary
Peter Melchett wrote suggesting that it would be useful if I responded to the report by Dr. Vandana Shiva entitled "The Golden Rice Hoax". I am pleased to do so and I am also enclosing background information on Vitamin A deficiency disorders and the Foundation's role in the development of Golden Rice that you may find informative.
First, it should be stated that we do not consider Golden Rice the solution to the vitamin A deficiency problem. Rather, it provides an excellent complement to fruits, vegetables and animal products in the diet, and to various fortified foods and vitamin supplements...




