What you can do
- Tell world leaders Copenhagen wasn't good enough for the climate
- Call for an end to investment in Trident
- Design an activist stronghold to stop the third runway at Heathrow
- Tell your MP to change the politics and save the climate
- Become a member of Airplot and stand in the way of a third runway
- Make a donation - we can't do it without your help
"Attention commuters! The next train to arrive will be a nuclear waste train"
Posted by bex on 26 July 2006.

Greenpeace activists warn commuters about a nuclear waste train passing through Kensington Olympia
End of the line for nuclear transports
Megaphone mania has hit stations around London as Greenpeace activists took to giant megaphones to alert commuters to the hidden hazard in their midst: terror targets on wheels.
Sizewell B - terrorism and risks
Publication date: February 2004
Summary
On 13th January 2003, Greenpeace volunteers gained access to the Sizewell nuclear power plant complex - for the second time in six months. Their aim was to expose the failings of nuclear security around the site (and spent nuclear fuel stores) and to highlight the risk of terrorist attack.
The potential for terrorist strikes on nuclear facilities
Publication date: January 2003
Summary
Governments have known since the 1990's that terrorists have regarded nuclear power plants as potential targets. Since intelligence reports that the fourth hijacked plane involved in the September 11th attacks on the United States may have been heading for the nuclear plant at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania, this concern has increased. The UK Office of Civil Nuclear Security (part of the Department of Trade and Industry) have now had to admit that nuclear power plants are possible terrorist targets. The most likely scenarios for an attack range from insider sabotage or theft of nuclear materials to outside invasion or assault on a nuclear reactor or waste store.
Overall, the nuclear industry defends its plants against natural and accidental incidents on the basis of 'as chance would have it' and it provides protection against human error by designing the systems and equipment to be tolerant and/or independent of human action (or inaction). This approach may have some effect in safeguarding the plant against accidents and unintentional human error but it could prove woefully ineffective against intentional and intelligently driven acts of terrorism.



