GP Worldwide

Creative Commons

Email Print

Assembly members confronted with support for wind power

Yes2Wind campaigners project their message onto the Assembly building in Cardiff

Yes2Wind campaigners project their message onto the Assembly building in Cardiff


Read more »
Email Print

Assembly building covered by 30ft high message

20 Sep 2004
Yes2Wind campaigners project their message onto the Assembly building in Cardiff

Yes2Wind campaigners project their message onto the Assembly building in Cardiff

Campaigners this morning projected a huge message onto the Assembly building in Cardiff. The environmental group Greenpeace emblazoned the words "80% Want Offshore Wind" across the front of the Cardiff Bay building in 30ft high letters. The move came as Assembly Members returned today for the new session, ready to decide the fate of a proposed wind farm at Scarweather Sands off Porthcawl.

An ICM poll released last week showed that 76% of people in Wales support the Westminster government's plans to build more wind farms, that 72% want them built in their area and that 80% support the construction of offshore wind farms, with just 10% in Wales opposed.

Greenpeace campaigner Sarah Shoraka said: "With global warming hitting home and the need for wind power so urgent, we felt the message deserved to be spelt out in a huge way. Wales wants wind, and over the next few weeks Assembly members can give the green light to an offshore wind farm that will power thousands of homes and show the rest of the country how Wales is leading the UK in the fight against climate change."

If they are to overturn the recent decision by the Assembly planning committee to allow the Scarweather project to go ahead, its opponents must secure the support of 10 AMs over the coming days. If they succeed, a debate and a vote will be held by the Assembly. Greenpeace is urging AMs to support the Swansea Bay project as evidence mounts that all areas of the UK face disruption from global warming.

Sarah Shoraka added: "The World Health Organisation says 150,000 people a year are dying from climate change. One of the best ways we defeat this menace is to generate our energy from clean renewable sources like offshore wind. There is some opposition to the Scarweather development, but our poll shows it is a vocal minority. Most people now appreciate the threat posed by global warming and know wind farms like this are the best way to fight it."

The projection began at 4am this morning. The message was projected in English and Welsh.

For fdetails of poll contact Greenpeace Press Office on 0207 865 8255.

 

Email Print

Scarweather sands wind farm given the go-ahead by Welsh Assembly

Scarweather wind farm get the green light

Scarweather wind farm get the green light

Our nine-month campaign to promote the development of a large wind farm off the coast of Porthcawl, South Wales, paid off yesterday when the planning committee of the Welsh Assembly agreed to back the proposal.

Following a public inquiry, held last November, the committee has approved proposals for thirty 120 metre turbines, situated between 3.5 and 4.3 miles off the coast. On completion the turbines will meet 10% of the renewable energy target set by the Welsh Assembly.


Read more »
Email Print

New report alerts Assembly Members to dangers of re-opening Wylfa nuclear power station

15 Mar 2001
Wylfa nuclear powerWelsh Assembly Members today heard the results of a Greenpeace funded report into the dangers of allowing the ageing Wylfa nuclear power station on Anglesey to reopen [1].


Speakers at the launch, held at the National Assembly, included report author, independent nuclear engineer John Large, Assembly Members Mick Bates (Liberal Democrats) and John Griffiths (Labour) and Dylan Morgan from PAWB (People Against Wylfa B/Pobol Atal Wylfa B).

Wylfa nuclear power station is currently closed following the discovery of defects in welds in the pressure vessel containing the nuclear reactor. Plant operators British Nuclear Fuels Ltd [2], are planning to reopen the reactors without repairing the welds. Instead, they want to fit 'restraints' which would limit rather than prevent radioactive discharges in the event of an accident.

In his presentation Mr Large highlighted the potential catastrophic consequences of defective welds inside the nuclear plant and the ageing and deterioration of other vital reactor components.

He also highlighted ongoing deterioration of the reactor system as the inevitable result of ageing, including:

  • The cracking of plates around pipework from the reactor boilers;
  • The corrosion of steel components inside the reactor, in particular the "core restraint garter" which surrounds the core of the nuclear reactor;
  • Corrosion or loss of volume in the graphite core of the reactor.

At the launch Mr Large argued that the inevitable deterioration of these components mean it is increasingly difficult to predict what might happen in an accident. He stated that the 'worst case scenario' accident for Wylfa is in fact far more serious than has previously been admitted by the NII.

He concluded that if Wylfa is allowed to re-open, a failure of the welds and the weakened reactor components could combine to result in uncontrolled, large-scale releases of radioactivity.

Mr Large also criticised regulation of nuclear safety regime by the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (NII) as secretive and lacking in rigour.

Greenpeace is launching the report at the National Assembly because of the interest that the Assembly has in issues of nuclear safety. A nuclear accident could have a serious impact on the environment, economy and the health of people in Wales. Officials for the Minister for the Environment have regular, formal meetings with the NII, but information on the discussions is not publicly available [3].

The report launch is part of a campaign to keep the reactors closed which is supported by other Campaign Organisations in Wales [4]. The campaign is demanding that the National Assembly ensures that all information on nuclear safety is made public, and that the Minister for the Environment should ask the NII to keep the reactors closed.

Report author John Large said,
"I am very surprised to learn that the NII are allowing BNFL to proceed with what I can only describe as an expedient bodge job. The NII are allowing BNFL to fit an external restraint system which does not address the fundamental problem of cracks in welds of a safety critical component of the reactor system. If any one of these safety systems should fail, the resulting intrusion of tonnes of superheated steam into the reactor will considerably test the core restraint system. It has been known that these systems are subject to ageing and strength degradation since the reactors were commissioned in 1971".

He continued, "Like the NII, I consider there to be a great deal of uncertainty about the state of the reactors, but unlike them, I would not consider allowing it to restart".

Assembly Member Mick Bates said,
"The Assembly must play a greater role in nuclear safety especially in view of our commitments to sustainable development, which means an increasing focus on renewable energy."

Dylan Morgan of PAWB (People Opposed to Wylfa B) said,
"There is deep distrust in Wales of nuclear safety at Wylfa. Our recent campaigning has shown widespread public support for an end to this nuclear threat. Wylfa should be shut for good".

Greenpeace Campaigner Bridget Woodman said,
"BNFL wants to play Russian Roulette with human health and the environment. Wylfa's ageing reactors should be shut down now, not patched up and run until a major nuclear accident occurs. The National Assembly - and the Minister for Environment in particular - should demand to know why the NII is letting BNFL proceed with its dangerous re-start plan".

Editor's notes:
[1] Review of Ageing Processes and their Influence on the Safety and Performance of Wylfa Nuclear Power Station, John Large, Large and Associates.

[2] Who own and operate the station through their Magnox Electric subsidiary

[3] On 8 march 2001, Sue Essex, Minister for Environment, stated that "My officials have regular and frequent contact with both [the NII and the HSE]. The most recent formal meeting was held at the National Assembly on 21st November 2000 and covered briefing on the current situation at Wylfa".

[4] The campaign is supported by PAWB (People Against Wylfa B/Pobol Atal Wylfa B), a group based on Anglesey, WANA (Welsh Anti-Nuclear Alliance) and CND Cymru.

Further information:
Contact:
Greenpeace Press Office on 020 7865 8255

 

Email Print

Who cares? The Welsh Assembly Statement of Opinion

Wylfa nuclear powerTwo Assembly Members -- Mick Bates and John Griffiths -- have tabled the following Statement of Opinion asking for the release of information on the safety problems at Wylfa, and the safety implications of reopening the station.


The National Assembly notes the recent Concordat between the Health and Safety Executive and the National Assembly for Wales recognising that the Assembly has an interest in issues of nuclear safety because of the impact a nuclear accident could have on the environment.


Read more »