investment

Out in the cold: investor risk in Shell's Arctic exploration

Publication date:  21 May, 2012

The Arctic Ocean is the last frontier for international oil companies, with rapid reductions in ice cover (due to climate change from the combustion of fossil fuels) making the exploitation of newly discovered offshore resources possible, at least theoretically. Royal Dutch Shell’s (Shell) proposed drilling programme in Alaska this year is seen as leading the charge into Arctic exploration by major oil companies.

Download the report:

10 reasons why investing in Arctic drilling is reckless – according to the world’s top risk assessors

Posted by sara_a - 19 April 2012 at 5:58pm - 5 Comments
Cairn's tugs drag icebergs out the way of its Arctic oil drilling rig
All rights reserved. Credit: Will Rose / Greenpeace
Cairn's tugs drag icebergs out the way of its Arctic oil drilling rig

Last week, Lloyd’s of London - the world’s leading insurer which sets the global standard for risk assessment - released a report warning investors not to rush in and invest in Arctic drilling. Looking at the industrial onslaught that is likely to hit the Arctic as the sea ice melts, the report covers the environmental impacts and financial risks of industrial fishing, shipping and mining. But it's most scathing on oil drilling, and in particular of the ability of oil companies to clean up after a major spill.

Arctic oil investment: dangerous, reckless and wrong

Posted by Igor Podgorny - 17 April 2012 at 4:19pm - 1 Comment
"Polar bears" welcome delegates to the Russian Arctic Oil and Gas Conference, Mo
All rights reserved. Credit: Greenpeace / Igor Podgorny
"Polar bears" welcome delegates to the Russian Arctic Oil and Gas Conference, Moscow

Whilst international investors and oil industry representatives have been meeting today in Moscow to hatch plans to drill for oil in the Russian Arctic, Greenpeace Russia activists peacefully occupied the entrance to the conference to ensure that they heard a different message: Arctic oil drilling is dangerous and reckless. Don’t invest in the destruction of this fragile ecosystem.­­­ 

The financial risks of Arctic drilling

Posted by Charlie Kronick - 12 April 2012 at 2:25pm - 3 Comments
Cairn's Leiv Eriksson rig off the coast of Greenland
All rights reserved. Credit: Greenpeace / Steve Morgan
Cairn's Leiv Eriksson rig off the coast of Greenland

For the past couple of years, Greenpeace has been ringing the bell, taking action and highlighting the risks and dangers of drilling for oil in the Arctic, the last great wilderness on Earth, and one of the most fragile ecosystems on the planet. Drilling there will almost certainly lead to oils spills, and would be devastating for the people, polar bears, walrus, seals, caribou or any of the other amazing creatures who lives depend on the arctic environment. 

Budget 2012: A polluters’ charter that puts fossil fuels in the tank of the British economy

Posted by jossg - 21 March 2012 at 4:05pm - 5 Comments
Osborne has given the oil industry £3bn of taxpayers' money for risky deep water drilling off the Shetland Islands (pic: BP's Deepwater Horizon spill in 2010)

Before the election George Osborne said, “Instead of the Treasury blocking green reform, I want a Conservative Treasury to lead the development of the low carbon economy and finance a green recovery.”

Getting to market: emerging investor risks in the tar sands

Publication date:  13 December, 2011

International oil companies continue to rely on Canadian tar sands for future growth. Tar sands extraction projects are again expanding and the industry ambition is to grow production from today’s level 37 per cent by 2015 and an extraordinary 138 per cent by 2025. Significant risks however still face the industry. Major environmental constraints remain - particularly greenhouse gas emissions and water use - as well more conventional challenges, including labour, equipment and service cost inflation in the region.

Download the report:

Are oil investors using the wrong indicators of value?

Posted by jamess - 17 January 2011 at 2:06pm - 0 Comments
Chopped down Boreal forest near a tar sands mine in Alberta, Canada
All rights reserved. Credit: Jiri Rezak / WWF
Chopped down Boreal forest near a tar sands mine in Alberta, Canada

We've released a report today with partners from Platform and Oil Change International about oil investment and increasingly risky sources of oil. Download the report here (pdf).

Lorne Stockman, from Oil Change International, blogs about the issues covered in the report:

Is a key valuation metric used by analysts to assess oil companies pushing big oil towards riskier and riskier projects?

Oil

Oil is the second biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions after coal. It’s responsible for about 27 per cent of the CO2 we release into the atmosphere. If we don’t start moving beyond oil now, the costs we pass on to our children will be unbearable.

We’re campaigning for a world beyond oil - a world that's cleaner, healthier and more peaceful. We won’t get there overnight, but we need to make a start…

Where we are now


Traffic in London

At the moment, oil is being used to power most of our vehicles, making us all dependent on it in some way - to get our food, to go to work, to see our loved ones.

Greenpeace bank job to beat recession

24 November, 2008

Four campaigners scaled the Bank of England this morning, ahead of the Chancellor’s pre-budget report this afternoon, and are unfurling a banner reading ‘GREEN IS GOOD’.

Turkish investors turn away from nuclear

Posted by bex - 30 September 2008 at 12:07pm - 2 Comments

Interesting news from our colleagues in Turkey, where 37 activists from Greenpeace and Global Action Group were arrested after protesting against nuclear energy last week.

The Turkish government has been busily trying to find a supplier for its first (of many, potentially) nuclear plant. But the plans have been stopped dead by... investors. Of the six companies supposedly interested in the contract, only one made a bid. And, without competition, Turkish law prevents the government from issuing the tender for a new nuclear plant.

Read more on Nuclear Reaction