GP Worldwide

Creative Commons

Email Print

'Green fuels' could be bad for the planet, say environmental and development groups

20 Mar 2007

A misjudged push for 'green' fuels could instead damage the climate and trash rainforests, according to the UK's largest environmental and development groups today.

Biofuels - which are similar to petrol but less environmentally damaging because they are made from crops and wastes - could play an important role in tackling global warming. But, say bosses from the RSPB, WWF, Greenpeace, Oxfam and Friends of the Earth, the government's dash for biofuels is ill thought out, lacks appropriate safeguards and could be creating more problems than it solves.

The government proposal - known as the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO) - could, in its present form, see businesses producing biofuels by destroying rainforests and wetlands, not only threatening endangered habitats and species but also releasing far more carbon into the atmosphere than could ever hope to be saved by replacing fossil fuels.

The groups are demanding the obligation is tightened up so that biofuel producers must meet minimum greenhouse gas and sustainability standards, with environmental audits of the whole life-cycle of the fuels, from growing the crop to transporting it to the pump.

Dr Douglas Parr, Chief Scientist at Greenpeace, said: "In its current form, this proposal is monumentally complacent. It could see biofuel production wrecking the climate rather than help it. The Government must sort out this botched plan or risk losing the value that biofuels can offer."

Phil Bloomer, Oxfam's Director of Campaigns & Policy, said "Biofuels could offer a way out of poverty for poor farmers and agricultural workers around the world. However, under this proposal they may do more harm than good, as deforestation is associated with land-grabbing, human rights abuses and deepening poverty. The government must take the lead in designing policies which ensure that biofuels do not come at the expense of vulnerable people's livelihoods."

Mark Avery, Director of Conservation at the RSPB, said "This proposal threatens to accelerate the destruction of some of the world's most precious habitats and wildlife. Without environmental standards, biofuels will be little more than a green con."

Adam Harrison, Food and Agriculture officer at WWF said: "The government's policy on biofuels is in danger of doing more harm than good. Without tough minimum standards, we risk escalating deforestation and even increasing our CO2 emissions."

Ed Matthew of Friends of the Earth, said: "It doesn't seem possible that the government could design a system for developing the biofuel industry that could actually make climate change worse but they seem to be managing it. Biofuels can be an important part of the solution to climate change but without rapid action from government to toughen up the standards the opportunity, and we may only have one, will be lost."

The group's full statement is:

The current political and business enthusiasm for renewable biofuels is understandable. This emerging industry could play an important role in tackling climate change. However, without appropriate safeguards, this flagship policy could have disastrous unintended consequences - actually increasing carbon emissions, intensifying deforestation and causing extensive negative social impacts.

We are concerned that Government's plans to promote biofuels through the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO), lack these precautions.

Greenhouse gas emissions savings from different biofuels vary widely and some can even result in an overall increase. The RTFO as proposed fails to distinguish between the biofuels that can contribute most to tackling climate change.

In addition, without strong, mandatory standards in place the RTFO will attract biofuels produced at the expense of forests, peat lands and natural grasslands in places such as Brazil and Indonesia. As well as being hugely important habitats, their destruction will add huge volumes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Making biodiesel from soy planted on cleared rainforest takes 200 years before it could be considered carbon neutral.

The expansion of tropical crops such as palm oil is also linked to the loss of indigenous peoples land rights, human rights abuse and the destruction of local communities' natural resources.

To gain our support, the RTFO must:

  • Ensure that biofuels meet strict externally audited, widely accepted and mandatory sustainability and greenhouse gas balance standards, including at least a 50 per cent saving on greenhouse gases compared to fossil fuels, taking a whole life-cycle approach
  • Take account of the greenhouse gases caused by land-use change and forest clearance to grow biofuels so that where high carbon land-uses are lost, no saving is claimed.

Although additional measures may become necessary, with these safeguards in place, biofuels are much more likely to contribute to a reduction in emissions from the transport sector without damaging the environment.

ENDS

For more information, contact:
Greenpeace press office on 020 7865 8255
Oxfam press office on 01865 472498
RSPB press office on 01767 681577
WWF press office on 01483 412388
Friends of the Earth press office on 020 7566 1649

Email Print

Over a barrel

Publication Date: 
5 Apr 2007
Body: 
This report by the Institute for European Environmental Policy studies scenarios in which practical and realistic steps are taken to curtail oil use in transport. A range of scenarios is examined on a 20-30 year timescale. The authors calculate that with simple transport efficiency measures Britain's dependence on foreign oil can be restricted from an eight-fold increase to a two-fold increase. Oil use could be reduced by developing:
  • Vehicles that are more fuel-efficient
  • The use of alternative transport fuels
  • A more efficient transport system, ensuring that people and goods are transported in a way that minimises fuel use
  • Reducing overall travel by road pricing, congestion charging and more home working
Email Print

Greenpeace response to government rejection of Whinash windfarm plans

2 Mar 2006
Coal Clough wind farm, Cumbria

Coal Clough wind farm, Cumbria


In response to today's announcement by the government that they have rejected plans to build what would have been England's largest windfarm at Whinash in Cumbria, Stephen Tindale, Executive Director of Greenpeace, said:

"Any Government that wants to expand airports and turn down windfarms is simply not fit to govern. It's hard to believe that the nuclear industry has not played some role in this.

"Climate change will ravage beautiful areas like the Lake District. I hope those responsible will be willing to explain to future generations how they played their part in allowing the savage grip of global warming to trash the countryside and claim hundreds of thousands of lives."

For further information please contact Greenpeace Press Office on 0207 865 8255.

 

 

Email Print

Greenpeace tells fuel protestors: "Stop whinging and face facts"

7 Sep 2005
Traffic jam

Traffic jam

 

Fuel protestors should stop moaning about the price of petrol and face the fact that we have to rely less on fossil fuels, Greenpeace said today.

As protestors threaten once again to picket refineries, Greenpeace campaigner Mark Strutt said: "Oil causes climate change and we import much of it from unstable regions. It's an inevitable fact of life that the price is going to rise. This price rise is a good thing because it will help reduce consumption, something we have to do as a matter of urgency. We can see the devastating results of climate change all around us as extreme weather events start to increase, just as scientists have been predicting."

Greenpeace urges the government to remain firm and not give in to the self-centred actions of the fuel protestors. Driving is now cheaper than it was in the 1970s in real terms, and motorists can save money by driving more fuel efficient cars and driving less. Hauliers should start looking at alternative fuels such as bio-diesel.

"The fact that sales of gas guzzlers like 4x4's are going through the roof means that fuel can't be that expensive. In the face of climate change you can't drive something that does less than 30 miles to the gallon and moan about the price of fuel," added Mark Strutt.

Greenpeace supports measures that:

 

  • Impose the full environmental cost of driving on the polluter

  • Encourage alternative fuels and more efficient technologies

  • Encourage the government to invest in a fully integrated public transport system

 

Greenpeace proposals include increasing road tax, increasing fuel duty and introducing congestion charging based on climate pollution impacts of vehicles throughout the UK.

For more contact Greenpeace on 0207 865 8255

 

 

 

Email Print

Greenpeace calls on governments and other companies to join the Cool Coalition

22 Jun 2004
A coal power station

A coal power station

Three world leaders in food and soft drinks today promised to phase out the powerful global warming gases, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) in their refrigeration equipment (1). The announcement comes 11 years after Greenpeace showed the world that the future of cooling could become climate-friendly.

In a joint conference in Brussels, Unilever, Coca-Cola and McDonald's presented their programme for the beginning of the end of HFCs. Their initiative is supported by Greenpeace and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).

The companies' pledges are a further response to Greenpeace demands made in the run-up to the Sydney Olympics in 2000, when the global environmental organisation called on each of these market leaders to commit to an HFC-free future. Within a month of Greenpeace launching a hard-hitting consumer campaign, Coca- Cola promised a phase-out in time for the Athens Olympics. Seven years earlier, in 1993, Greenpeace had proved HFCs were unnecessary for refrigeration, when it developed and marketed Greenfreeze, the world's first CFC- and HFC-free refrigerator. Greenfreeze revolutionised the technology and became an industry standard in domestic refrigeration (2).

Gerd Leipold, Executive Director of Greenpeace International said:

"Greenpeace welcomes the commitments made by Unilever, Coca-Cola and McDonald's. We call on their competitors, such as Nestle, Pepsi and Burger King, to follow suit. But corporate action is only half the picture. For a complete solution, governments must act. Politicians can't sit back and wait for the market to deliver, because on its own, it won't."

As of 2005, Unilever Ice-Cream will purchase only HFC-free ice-cream cabinets. Already, some 14,000 units have been replaced. Coca-Cola will convert millions of drinks-vending machines around the world to non-HFC refrigerants. McDonald's will make changes in some 30,000 restaurants, converting its 11 types of refrigeration units - including air-conditioning, walk-in-freezers, salad and drinks coolers - to alternative refrigerants.

Behind all three companies stand major technology suppliers, which have made these technologies available thanks to multi-million-Euro investments. As the companies presented their phase-out strategies at today's conference, the suppliers presented their technologies, based on natural hydrocarbons, CO2 and Stirling.

"But three companies are not going to prevent climate change. At expected rates of usage, by 2050 HFCs will contribute as much to global warming as all the private cars on the planet today," concluded Leipold.

Further information
Please contact Katharine Mill, Greenpeace Media Officer based in Brussels, 0032 496 156 229 or Greenpeace UK Press Office on 0207 865 8255

Greenpeace briefing: "The cool story of the phase out of CFC and HFC in refrigeration" available at www.greenpeace.org.uk or from the Greenpeace Press Office

Notes to Editors:
(1) HFCs are far more potent for global warming than the best-known greenhouse gas, CO2. They were introduced by the chemical industry 15 years ago, around the time CFCs started to be regulated under the Montreal Protocol.
(2) Greenpeace developed the Greenfreeze technology together with the East German company FORON, having opposed the introduction of HFCs from the start. Now an industry standard in Europe, China, Japan, Latin America and Australia, it has sold some 120 million models to date. Outside the US, Greenfreeze established itself as the leading technology for domestic fridges.
(3) Greenpeace demands that:

  • Governments phase-out HFCs immediately, or, where no immediate substitutes exist, specific phase-out dates are fixed. No time frame should exceed five years.
  • Governments tax the use of HFCs until phase-out. The tax would be based on global warming potential and, thus, on environmental impact of applications.
  • The Parties to the Montreal Protocol stop the funding of HFC projects through the Multilateral Fund and dramatically accelerate the phase-out of HCFCs. Governments establish a compensatory fund into which HFC-producers pay, to compensate for environmental and human health cost arising from the extensive use of HFCs.
  • The European Union introduce immediate phase-out dates for HFCs in all applications in its proposed Fluorinated Gases Regulation.

     

Email Print

Global warming - the real cost of fuel?

RoadsEdinburgh.jpg

Our message takes to the streets of Edinburgh


Email Print

Greenpeace guerrilla garages

London garage: sign

London garage: sign

Greenpeace has given away thousands of litres of free green fuel to motorists today at refurbished 'guerrilla garages' across the country.


Read more »
Email Print

Fuel prices background brief

Body: 

Publication date: September 2000

Summary
The risk to our climate

  • The majority of the world's carbon pollution comes from oil products like petrol and diesel. We can avoid a runaway greenhouse effect but only if we break our addiction to fossil fuels and make the transition to an economy run on renewable energy and hydrogen.
  • Fossil fuel use is already changing our climate. The arctic ice cap has already thinned from 10ft to 6ft in the last 20 years as a result of warmer seas. Scientists predict that the entire polar ice cap could disappear every summer within the next 50 years....

Email Print

New era dawns for UK renewable energy industry

4 Apr 2001
wind turbines at sunset

wind turbines at sunset

The UK wind industry had a massive boost today when the Crown Estate gave the green light to 18 new offshore wind farms around the coast of England and Wales, with the combined potential to supply one million homes.

The 18 new sites could generate 1,620 MegaWatts of green electricity, which would quadruple the UK's total current wind energy output. They will cut emissions of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, by 4.27 million tonnes each year, and create at least 8,000 jobs in the UK, with the potential to create a further 28,000 jobs if turbine factories are established in Britain.

The UK is one of the windiest countries in Europe. Offshore wind alone could supply all our electricity needs three times over. Wind energy is clean and green - and crucially doesn't threaten the world's climate.

Matthew Spencer, Head of Greenpeace's Climate Campaign, said, "After thirty years of opposing industrial abuse of our seas, Greenpeace can at last welcome a move to exploit the fantastic renewable energy resources off our coastline. After the grim news of Bush's climate climbdown, we finally have some good news for the environment."

"Let's hope this signals a new commitment to developing Britain's renewable energy industry. Britain has always lagged behind other European countries in renewable energy, but now we've got a real hope of being up with the leaders. Today's announcement will show Bush and his oil cronies that Britain is serious about tackling climate change - and about lessening our dependence on fossil fuels."

Notes to Editors:

  • A map showing the locations of the new windfarms is available from the Crown Estate.
  • Photos and footage of offshore wind farms are available from the Greenpeace Press Office: tel. 020 7865 8294.
  • You can download a background briefing on offshore wind by clicking on 'full report' at the top of this page. The file is prepared as a PDF. The briefing covers wind power potential globally and for the UK, industrial and employment opportunities, other countries' plans and targets for wind energy, and obstacles to fulfilling the UK's potential.
  • A square sea area with sides 77 miles long could provide as much electricity as the current UK supply.
  • Greenpeace, with RSPB, WWF, CPRE, The Wildlife Trusts, Friends of the Earth and Green Alliance, jointly called on the Government to adopt a General Election manifesto pledge to allocate £00 million per year to support offshore wind power.
  • Greenpeace launched a major campaign to promote offshore wind power. 'The Wind' a short film by Director Julien Temple, with voiceovers by Rachel Wise and John Hurt, was shown at over a hundred cinemas around the UK as a trailer to Universal's blockbuster Bridget Jones's Diary, which was launched in April.

 

 

 

Email Print

Oil won't fuel the future

Traffic jam

Traffic jam


Published on March 27, 2001