Email Print

Can '6 step programme' wean nuclear nations off their A-bomb addiction?

David Miliband MP

Can David Miliband find a cure for nuclear weapons addiction?

Foreign Secretary David Miliband gave a speech today in London outlining a new '6 step programme' for creating a world free of nuclear weapons. His speech was largely a response to pressure created by recent high-profile campaigns emerging from the US, which have been calling for step by step progress towards the ultimate abolition of the world's nuclear arsenals.

Getting rid of the bomb? Sounds like radical stuff, but what's particularly radical is who is behind these campaigns. Not your 'usual suspect' peaceniks, but rather some of the biggest names in international diplomacy, who have come together to demand action on global security because they see the spread of nuclear weapons as the biggest threat to our immediate future.

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

Mafia accused of trafficking nuclear waste

There's a truly frightening story – and a sharp reminder that its failure to tackle climate change isn’t the only problem with nuclear power - in The Guardian today.

A mafia clan in Italy is accused of trafficking nuclear waste and trying to make plutonium (ie nuclear weapons). It's alleged, says The Guardian, "to have made illegal shipments of radioactive waste to Somalia, as well as seeking the 'clandestine production' of other nuclear material".

Eight former employees of the state energy research agency Enea, suspected of paying the mafia to take the nuclear waste off their hands, are also being investigated.

"An Enea manager is said to have paid the clan to get rid of 600 drums of toxic and radioactive waste from Italy, Switzerland, France, Germany, and the US… with Somalia as the destination lined up by the traffickers… But with only room for 500 drums on a ship waiting at the northern port of Livorno, 100 drums were secretly buried somewhere in the southern Italian region of Basilicata."

The full story's here.

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

Too hot to handle: the future of civil nuclear power

We've been arguing for a long time that nuclear power can't stop climate change - because replacing our whole fleet of nuclear power stations would only reduce our carbon emissions by four per cent, some time after 2024 (far too little, far too late).

The Oxford Research Group has just published an interesting study on the subject. It says that, for nuclear power to make any significant contribution to a reduction in global carbon emissions in the next two generations, the industry would have to construct nearly 3,000 new reactors globally - about one a week for 60 years.

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

What we are doing about nuclear power

Email Print

Britain's new bomb programme exposed

Publication Date: 
20 Oct 2006
Body: 

Summary

On 24 September 1996, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) was opened for signatures. The treaty banned all nuclear tests - thus stopping new countries acquiring nuclear weapons, and existing nuclear-weapons states from developing new nuclear weapons. Alongside the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), it was hailed as a major step towards nuclear disarmament.

At the time, the Labour government played a key role in pushing for the treaty and in urging other countries to support it.

This briefing reveals:

  • how now, 10 years on, the UK Government risks destroying the treaty;
  • how billions of pounds are currently being invested in building hi-tech equipment at the Aldermaston nuclear weapons laboratory;
  • that the new facilities planned for the site enable Aldermaston to design and build new nuclear weapons; and
  • scientists' concerns that taking a high-tech approach to the virtual design and development of new nuclear weapons will inevitably lead to a return to full scale nuclear testing.

All this is happening prior to any parliamentary or public debate on whether the UK should build a nuclear weapons system. Fundamental questions such as: 'How are Cold War nuclear weapons relevant to 21st century foreign policy?' 'What real threats does the UK face?' and 'What effect would building a new bomb have on international disarmament negotiations?' - all remain unanswered.

Email Print

High level delegation turned away from gates of Aldermaston

12 Jun 2006
A delegation of church leaders and MSPs outside the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston

A delegation of church leaders and MSPs outside the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston

This morning a high level delegation of Church Leaders and members of the Scottish Parliament were refused a meeting by the Aldermaston Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) and turned away by armed police.

The delegation had formally requested a meeting with the Managing Director of AWE to ask why more than a billion pounds is being spent on new facilities and technical staff at Aldermaston despite the fact the government claim not to have made a decision on whether or not to replace Trident (1).

Requests for a meeting inside the base were refused so a further letter was sent requesting a meeting at the gate. Today this too was turned down. The delegation instead read out a list of demands to the government. These included that:

  • No further commitment be made to new developments before a decision has been made on whether to replace Trident.
  • Government should disclose to Parliament the proposals for developments at AWE including the cost, timescale and purpose of each of the facilities which may be built or refurbished.
  • Meantime Trident should not be replaced and no new weapons should be deployed by the UK government.
  • More resources at AWE should be focused on disarmament verification and nuclear decommissioning -- in line with Britain's obligations under the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty.

The group, which included the Moderator of the Church of Scotland and The Right Hon. Lord Murray, former Lord Advocate, (Scotland's most senior law officer) were then taken on a tour of the outside of the military site, having key new developments pointed out to them.

The Right Reverend Alan McDonald, the Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland said, "If no decision has been made on whether to replace Trident then why are billions flowing into Aldermaston and why are new hi tech lasers and super computers being installed behind closed doors?"

He continued, "The Government should listen to the findings of Hans Blix's new WMD Report which clearly calls for the UK to refrain from developing new weapons, as such a move would encourage a new arms race."

The AWE in Aldermaston near Reading is where Britain's Trident nuclear weapons are designed and built. From there they travel in convoys to Faslane in Scotland where the Trident submarines that carry the nuclear missiles are based. Developments are currently underway on the site which AWE themselves describe as 'on the scale of Heathrow's Terminal 5 expansion' (2). They strongly suggest that the government has already decided to develop a new generation of UK nuclear weapons. These include:

  • Government investment of £1 billion in Aldermaston over the next 3 years and commitment to invest a further £5 billion.
  • Preparations to build a new laser, called Orion, which is one thousand times more powerful than the existing one onsite.
  • Development of new 'super computers' - capable of simulating nuclear tests and designing new weapons - which will increase the facility's computing power by a factor of nine hundred.
  • Plans to build new hydrodynamics test facilities and tritium and highly enriched uranium plants.
  • Plans for recruitment of 80 new specialist scientists and advertising for staff to join the 'warhead development centre'.

Following the fact-finding visit the delegation will travel to the House of Commons to meet Hans Blix, who will present the new UN Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Commission report to MPs and the media. The report recommends that nuclear weapons be outlawed completely and highlights how important Britain's decision whether or not to build a new generation of nuclear weapons is to the future of international nuclear disarmament:

"Any state contemplating replacement or modernization of its nuclear-weapon systems must consider such action in the light of all relevant treaty obligations and its duty to contribute to the nuclear disarmament process. As a minimum, it must refrain from developing nuclear weapons with new military capabilities or for new missions. It must not adopt systems or doctrines that blur the distinction between nuclear and conventional weapons or lower the nuclear threshold."

"France and the UK...are now at a crossroads: going down one road would show their conviction that nuclear weapons are not necessary for their security, while the other would demonstrate to all other states a belief that these weapons continue to be indispensable". (3)

The delegation has travelled from Scotland to reflect widespread Scottish opposition to nuclear weapons. Britain's Trident nuclear submarines are currently based at Faslane on the west coast of Scotland. The delegation is being jointly organised by Scottish CND, Greenpeace and the Nuclear Information Service.


(1) A letter requesting a meeting at Aldermaston was sent on May 1st. A reply rejecting the application was received on 2 June. A follow up letter requesting that Don Cook the Managing Director of AWE meet the delegation at the front gate to discuss their concerns was then sent to the facility.
(2) Source AWE Today magazine December 2005.
(3) ) For more on the Blix report visit http://www.wmdcommission.org/. See page 99 for relevant quotes on new UK nuclear weapons.

The delegation includes Bill Butler MSP, Labour; Colin Fox MSP, Leader Scottish Socialist Party; Rev. Kathy Galloway, Leader Iona Community; Robin Harper MSP, Co-leader Scottish Green Party; Mary Alice Mansell, Scottish Quaker General Meeting; Dr Richard McCready, National Secretary Justice and Peace Scotland (Catholic Church); Right Rev. Alan McDonald, Moderator Church of Scotland; Isobel Lindsay Vice Chair Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament; Lord Ronald King Murray, former Lord Advocate; Matt Smith, Scottish Secretary, UNISON; Sandra White MSP, Scottish National Party; John Ainslie, Coordinator Scottish Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament; Simon Clydesdale Greenpeace; Dr. Rebecca Johnson, The Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy; Philip Austen, Quaker Peace and Social Witness; Di McDonald, Executive Director Nuclear Information Service; Kate Hudson, Chair CND; Richard Maguire, Mountbatten Centre for International Studies.

Email Print

NATO HQ blocked by replica nuclear missile

Greenpeace activists block NATO's Brussels HQ with a full-size replica of a US B61 nuclear bomb

Greenpeace activists block NATO's Brussels HQ with a full-size replica of a US B61 nuclear bomb

Twenty four Greenpeace activists from the UK. Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Turkey were arrested this morning after staging a protest at NATO's Brussels headquarters. Their demand: removal of the 480 US-owned and controlled nuclear weapons from Europe. The action occurred as NATO Defence Ministers prepared for a high-level meeting on the future of NATO.


Email Print

Briton arrested in NATO nuclear blockadeGreenpeace calls for "Nukes out of NATO"

8 Jun 2006
Nukes out of NATO - Greenpeace activists enter the NATO site in Brussels

Nukes out of NATO - Greenpeace activists enter the NATO site in Brussels

A Briton was amongst 24 Greenpeace volunteers arrested this morning for blockading the main entrance to NATO with a replica B61 nuclear bomb and dropping a banner from the main NATO building roof calling for "Nukes out of NATO"1.

The protest coincided with the start of a NATO Defence Ministers meeting preparing for a debate on the future of NATO.

A recent report by a US think tank revealed that 480 US/NATO nuclear weapons currently remain in Europe - twice the amount previously thought2. These include 110 B61 nuclear bombs based at RAF Lakenheath in Suffolk3. The remaining weapons are spread across Germany, Belgium, Italy, the Netherlands, and Turkey. Each of these bombs has a destructive capacity up to ten times of that which destroyed Hiroshima and together they have a combined power capable of wiping Europe off the map.

Greenpeace Disarmament Campaigner Simon Clydesdale said "With all the debate over Iran's nuclear intentions, countries must accept their own responsibility and role in de-escalating nuclear tensions. By removing US NATO nuclear weapons, European leaders have the opportunity to strengthen the position of Europe in negotiations with the Middle East and Russia and take a real step towards achieving a more peaceful future".

He added: "Now is the time to make a 21st century NATO free of 20th century nuclear weapons and policies."

A report released last week by the Commission on Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDC) chaired by Hans Blix explicitly called for all 480 US/NATO nuclear weapons to be removed from Europe.4 It explained how the failure to withdraw these weapons is impeding international efforts to negotiate further Russian nuclear reductions.

The governments of NATO countries have a direct role in shaping NATO policy and can insist that these weapons be removed from their territory. The US has been told to take their weapons home several times before: Canada, Greece, Denmark (Greenland) and Iceland are all now free of US nuclear bombs.


For further information: contact Greenpeace UK press office on 020 7865 8255.

Notes to Editor:
For more about the Greenpeace campaign visit http://www.greenpeace.org/international/press/reports/securing-our-safety.

Read the full story

1 The arrested UK volunteer is Trish Whitham of Berkshire.

2 Hans Kristensen, "U.S. Nuclear Weapons in Europe: A Review of Post-Cold War Policy, Force Levels, and War Planning" (Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington DC, February 2005)

3 RAF Lakenheath is a US military base situated near Cambridge. It is home to nearly 5,500 US military personnel and 2,700 American, British and Icelandic civilians.

As well as hosting 110 B61 nuclear bombs, Lakenheath is also the base for two squadrons of F-15 Strike Eagle aircraft, which are assigned for delivering the B61 nuclear bombs. These planes are the most advanced two-seat tactical fighter aircraft in the world and capable of carrying up to 5 bombs each. This is more than the F16s and Tornado aircraft deployed in other NATO nuclear bases in Europe, which can only carry two. Their presence is the key reason RAF Lakenheath is considered the most important US tactical nuclear bombing base in Europe.

4 WMDC RECOMMENDATION 21: "Russia and the United States should proceed to implement the commitments they made in 1991 to eliminate specific types of non-strategic nuclear weapons, such as demolition munitions, artillery shells and warheads for short-range ballistic missiles. They should agree to withdraw all non-strategic nuclear weapons to central storage on national territory, pending their eventual elimination. The two countries should reinforce their 1991 unilateral reduction commitments by developing arrangements to ensure verification, transparency and irreversibility."

WMDC RECOMMENDATION 22: "Every state that possesses nuclear weapons should make a commitment not to deploy any nuclear weapon, of any type, on foreign soil." http://www.wmdcommission.org

 

 

Email Print

Hans Blix challenges Bush's nuclear weapons programme at the UN

A D-5 Trident II missile spins out of control after being launched from the nuclear-powered strategic missile submarine USS Tennessee

A D-5 Trident II missile spins out of control after being launched from the nuclear-powered strategic missile submarine USS Tennessee


Published on June 1, 2006