Activists stop oil drilling for second time in one week

Posted by nick_gp - 4 June 2011 at 7:57pm - Comments

Just before being arrested today, oil campaigner Ben Ayliffe radioed the nearby Greenpeace ship Esperanza from the oil rig he and 17 other activists had boarded:

“We have met with the drill manager and requested a copy of the oil spill plan, which we assume he has on board, yet once again we have been refused even sight of it. What is Cairn Energy trying to hide? We have phoned, written, faxed, emailed and now even paid a visit to the rig to get a plan that should be in the public domain and should be subject to independent verification and public scrutiny."

It’s a reasonable request, but one that Cairn clearly seems unwilling or unable to comply with. Perhaps that’s because their plan, if they have one, is insufficient.

The reality is that even if it does exist there is no way a BP-style deep sea blow out could be cleaned up in this remote and fragile environment. There is no way such a plan could provide assurances that the environment and Greenland’s fishing industry would not be decimated.

One of the last to be removed from the rig by police was Andreas Bergstrom. He and three others locked themselves in crane cabs to remain on the rig as long as possible.

Andreas is an Arctic guide who lives in Svalbard, and for him the campaign to stop oil drilling in the Arctic is personal. He knows better than most what there is to lose in the event of an accident.

While locked into the crane he was also in radio contact with the Esperanza had this to say:

“We scaled this rig to demand the oil spill response plan but they’ve refused to even tell us if they have one. Cairn Energy are simply unable to tell the world how they’d deal with a BP-style Arctic spill, so we’re going to stay here and stop them drilling for as long as we can. While I’m in this crane cabin this beautiful fragile environment is safe from this deep water oil rig. The only guarantee of safety is for the drills to be shut down permanently.”

Together the 18 activists stopped drilling for eight hours today which, along with Luke and Hannah’s efforts earlier in the week, is a great effort - but drilling needs to stop altogether here in the Arctic. Our week of action has, as well as stopping the drilling for a time, brought the issue into stark focus on the international stage.

So back here on the Esperanza, we are extremely proud of our friends and crewmates. They’ve risked their freedom to make a stand for the Arctic and that’s no small thing.

That’s the end for today - but it’s not over by a long shot.

This is too important for us to let the reckless greed of oil companies ride roughshod over common sense.

As the global temperature climbs and the ice melts, we should not be using that as an opportunity to press ever further towards the ends of the earth in search of every last drop of oil. Instead we should focus our efforts on developing clean renewable energy and fuel efficiency. We must ease our addiction to oil before it’s too late.

Cairn is now seeking an injunction against Greenpeace claiming that the pod protest hindered operations. Cairn argues that every day the rig is prevented from drilling costs the company up to US$4 million. If granted, the injunction would mean Greenpeace would have to pay 2 million euros in fines for every subsequent breach and every day we stop the Leiv Eiriksson operating. The case will be heard in a Dutch court on Monday.

We’re signing off on the Esperaza for now – so over to you.

the oil is part of all our lives and is needed, everyone understands greenpeace's need to see this plan from Cairn, but disruption to the drilling, and boarding an oil rig without proper knowledge of health and safety onboard, is very very silly.

I have family in the oil field, surely greenpeace can find other means to express themselves, other than endanger oil workers. People are so focused on watching these greenpeace folk, that their minds are not fully on their work. I really hope no accidents occurr due to greenpeace boarding oil platforms that they really should not be on.These oil platforms are dangerous enough as it is, let alone unqualified activists plonking themselves in crane cabs and goodness knows what!

 

 

Well I'll be blowed. Some beardy ruffians board a marine vessel illegally and the people on board aren't particularly well disposed to showing them an oil spill plan. Really?  How surprised should the world be at what is a ridiculous course of action, and one which makes Greenpeace look infantile at best and downright irresponsible. This sort of thing is not very far from piracy in legal terms - that would be an interesting charge against Greenpeace.

There is a 500m exclusion zone around the rig - this is a legal constraint backed up by maritime law, which has been violated by the Greenpeace activists who are by definition, now breaking the law. This is not a game. Laws are there to be obeyed, by all.  Greenpeace will only lose respect from those they would like to win over, by actions which prove them to be nothing worse than terrorists or rioters. or thieves or tax evaders - basically anyone else who chooses to believe that the law does not apply to them.

Wake up Greenpeace. these tactics are from 30 years ago. You need to win your battles by convincing people that you are legally right as well as morally right. Those morals are of course Greenpeace's morals, and not necessarily those of the majority, or minority, whatever. Don't try so hard to make people believe you're right, that you end up looking like a bunch of fanatics to do so.

Personally, I hope the Danish government throw the book at those arrested. The law must be seen to be upheld. These people have put themselves and others in the way of harm, which is an action that cannot be condoned, whatever the reason.

The oil spill contingency plan exists. Just because Cairn choose not to show it to Greenpeace does not make it any less existant, or valid, or functional or correct. It's there. The rig would nt be allowed to operate in the area if it was not.

These actions make Greenpeace look childish, immature and inneffectual as a body that is supposed to credibly represent the environmental concerns that should genuinely be questioned here. Cairn have convinced the Danish government that they will be working safely and environmentally responsibly. The same can not be said for Greenpeace who have only managed to break the law to date/

Time to grow up and act more responsibly IMHO. A harsh statement towards those who would argue strenuously that Greenpeace are the responsible ones, but sadly this is not a trait they are currently demonstrating to the rest of the world.

 

 

 

 

If 18 activists can "endanger oil workers" and "cause an accident" then I suggest there is something seriously wrong with Cairn's health and safety policy. If the work environment upon the rig is one where accidents could occur if workers are simply distracted then it has to be one of the most negligent work environments around. I'm sure even Cairn Energy aren't that irresponsible as to not have fail-safe procedures in place.

How can you seriously question Greenpeace's methods in light of what oil industry are planning to do? Are you suggesting that the mad rush to "carve up" the Arctic will be a safe one? And most importantly, what happens if another disastor like in the Gulf of Mexico occurs? It would devestation to this pristine environment of the likes that have never been seen.

Cairn are the ones acting irresponsibly. Their refusal to show us their response plan is childish and effectively admits that it is not adequate. What other reason would they have not to disclose it? Big oil companies like Cairn have huge amounts of money set aside for coorporate lobbying, the likes of which Greenpeace can only dream of.

I think it's time for people to wake up and see Cairn for the coorporate bullies they are. They have no respect for the environment they work in, no respect for the legitimate concerns raised by others and are solely focussed on making big money, at the expense of anyone or thing that stands in their way.

This needs to be stopped before it's too late, and Greenpeace are doing a fantastic job in making the public aware of Cairn's greedy attitudes. I bet Cairn's PR gurus are working overtime coming up with replies for this article.

At the end of the day, Cairn needs to wake up and realise that they can`t keep the response plan in hiding forever. One day it will have to come out, and most likely that day will be when it`s far to late. What are they to do then? They way they are acting is childish.

Greenpeace are doing the right thing by making the public aware of Cairn`s greedy money-grabbing ways, and I hope this will make people think a lot more about the huge risks- what if another disator happened like in the Gulf of Mexico? Sure, they might say they are sorry, clean up a few birds, but what about after that? The mess will still be there. Animals and people will still be suffering.

Wake up Cairn, it`s been going on for far far to long now. If you want to put your company in the clear again, and make your self innocent, then show the plans. Untill then, just remember the Gulf of Mexico. Would you really want to have to know that you could end up being the one`s causing a huge blow on the enviroment?

At the end of the day, Cairn needs to wake up and realise that they can`t keep the response plan in hiding forever. One day it will have to come out, and most likely that day will be when it`s far to late. What are they to do then? They way they are acting is childish.

Greenpeace are doing the right thing by making the public aware of Cairn`s greedy money-grabbing ways, and I hope this will make people think a lot more about the huge risks- what if another disator happened like in the Gulf of Mexico? Sure, they might say they are sorry, clean up a few birds, but what about after that? The mess will still be there. Animals and people will still be suffering.

Wake up Cairn, it`s been going on for far far to long now. If you want to put your company in the clear again, and make your self innocent, then show the plans. Untill then, just remember the Gulf of Mexico. Would you really want to have to know that you could end up being the one`s causing a huge blow on the enviroment?

@ Bonzo the Magnificent

For sure you work for Cairn Energy and if not you're just the living proof of how selfish we -humans- could be. You're questionning laws and asking people to respect them when the oil rig is the first thing that do not respect any law.

I'm agree that claiming the Oil spill plan is infantine because in this very case, the best thing to do is to damage the rig BEFORE it starts its journey. Damage it each time it starts to sail. 

Drilling in the Arctic is unrespectful, is insane and it shows that they simply doesn't care about what could happen. 

After all mess we've created in Gulf we cannot tollerate that even something closer would occour again. There -in the Gulf- the plan (a copy and pasted one) existed but plans are only paper sheets in a lawyer and they won't clean up sea water.They won't save sea animals and they won't block oil to spill. 

Heiland Stark

Follow Greenpeace UK