Chevron could get government permission to start deepwater drilling today

Posted by tracy - 30 September 2010 at 12:12pm - Comments

Chevron's drill ship is poised to begin exploratory oil drilling in the remote deep water Lagavulin site west of Shetland as soon as the government gives them permission. And that could happen later today.

Our activists on board the Greenpeace ship Esperanza have done all they can over the last week to stop the Stena Carron drill ship from getting to Lagavulin, now we urgently need your help to put direct pressure on the UK government to stop the drilling.

Please write to Energy Secretary Chris Huhne and tell him that he must not give Chevron final permission to begin drilling at Lagavulin.

The site Chevron wants to start drilling lies 1,569 metres below the sea. That's far beyond the depth of BP's Deepwater Horizon rig. The delicate ecosystem at Lagavulin, which is home to dolphins and many other species, would be devastated by an oil spill.

For the last month we've been telling the government that Chevron's three page environmental assessment for drilling is woefully inadequate. Yesterday the government released detailed information supplied by Chevron about the possible impacts of drilling at Lagavulin.

At first glance some of the things Chevron is saying about the limited impacts of a spill in Lagavulin are extraordinary. Chevron says the affects of a spill on whales and dolphins is not something to worry about because "whilst a number of marine mammals may be present in the area, given their good swimming abilities, relative intelligence and nomadic behaviour, some avoidance behaviour could be expected."

Given the volume of the new information from Chevron, and the bizarre assertions it contains, we think it's entirely unreasonable for the government to give Chevron permission to begin drilling today.

We have yet to learn the full consequences of the Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico, but already we know that a spill in UK waters would be disastrous for these fragile habitats, and in the long term our continued dependence on oil will seriously hamper our ability to tackle climate change and undermine our economic stability.

Please write to Chris Huhne and ask him to suspend plans for Lagavulin and other new deep sea drilling in UK waters.

Thanks for your question. We were doing our best to prevent Chevron's drill ship reaching it's proposed drilling site. Call us cynical if you like, but when an oil company sends a drilling ship to a place where it suspects there is oil to be drilled (at a cost to itself of tens of thousands of pounds a day), we assumed that it expects that ship to do some drilling when it gets there.

We also assumed that the people within Chevron who sent the ship out to Lagavulin were pretty confident that permission to drill would be granted when it got there - as it was within hours of the issuing of the injunction which forced us to call off our action.

So while halting the Stena Carron hasn't stopped its drilling mission, we certainly delayed it, inconvenienced the company, and demonstrated to them and the government that there is serious opposition to their ill-thought out plans to go after hard to get oil sources with no attempt to explain how they would deal with the sort of blow out which caused such havoc in the Gulf of Mexico.

Regards,

Joss

Online Producer, Greenpeace UK

'ill thought out plans'? - you guys are great! Encroaching a rigs safety zone and illegally boarding it, putting the lives of over 100 souls onboard at risk so you can put up a banner? Then realising less than 2 days later that it was getting a bit nippy (weren't the icebergs a giveaway?) and you had no way of getting down other than by seeking help from the guys you had endangered? You put those big bad oil companies to shame!

Joss, Thanks for the logical response but, for the record, I never called you cynical, I said it was I who was being cynical. I appreciate the confirmation although I still don't understand your comment 'we certainly delayed it' - if the licence was granted after your action ended I don't understand what effect your action had. Can you also clarify what Greenpeaces definition is of 'Deepwater' drilling. In previous blogs you have stated that the Lagavulin well is only in 500m of water - surely this is not deepwater???? The blowout in the Gulf of Mexico was in over 1500m of water. Thanks in advance

Hi norbert, Chevron was about to get permission from the government to drill earlier in septermber – the Stena Carron was set to leave Lerwick for Lagavulin to start drilling there, the finger was on the button, and we stopped that from happening. So between our actions at sea and our lawyers working behind the scenes, we stopped Chevron’s ability to drill and delayed the government’s plans to permit them. Hopefully that clears it up. Tracy GPUK

Has Chevron actually been stopped from drilling as your later news releases say that the licence hasn't been issued yet? If the licence hasn't been issued then you have not delayed them and surely the past few days has just been a waste of fuel, money, time and effort? Sorry for sounding cynical but I have been watching this with interest and had assumed (wrongly) that you were actually preventing the ship from drilling?? Clarification would be appreciated!! Thanks

Follow Greenpeace UK