HSBC backs nuclear power in Indian earthquake zone

Posted by jamie - 11 May 2011 at 12:34pm - Comments
Site of the proposed nuclear power station in Jaitapur, India
All rights reserved. Credit: Apoorva Salkade / Greenpeace
Site of the proposed nuclear power station in Jaitapur, India

Two months ago, an earthquake and tsunami hit Japan. This not only resulted in a huge natural disaster and humanitarian crisis, but also triggered an unprecedented man-made tragedy. And yet plans are afoot to build a nuclear power plant in another earthquake zone, this time in India.

The Fukushima nuclear power plant is still out of control, threatening the health of thousands of people and their livelihoods. If making mistakes with nuclear energy is bad enough, not learning from those mistakes is indefensible.

Tell HSBC and BNP Paribas not to invest in risky nuclear power

So it seems absurd that anyone would want to build a new nuclear facility in another seismically-active area. Yet the proposed plant in Jaitapur – on the western coast of the sub-continent, a few hundred kilometres south of Mumbai - looks set to repeat the same careless and short-sighted mistakes that left Japan to cope with not just the devastation caused by the earthquake and tsunami, but also the consequences of radioactive pollution.

Of course, such ill-conceived plans are very expensive and require financial backing from major banks. Two banks in particular – HSBC and BNP Paribas – are getting involved in the Jaitapur project. With the risks involved being so clearly demonstrated at Fukushima, surely staying away from nuclear and backing clean, renewable energy would be a safer investment?

It's worth bearing in mind that wind farms in Japan withstood the natural disaster. Weigh that alongside the Indian environment minister's admission the government's current plans for a massive coastal nuclear power plant do not cover the possible event of a tsunami. What's more, the proposed site is located in an area of high seismic activity and fragile local ecology.

But, you can encourage them to change - email the boards fo HSBC and BNP Paribas and tell them to call a halt to this hazardous plan. Today also marks the annual general meeting of BNP Paribas and HSBC’s strategy day – both excellent opportunities for their shareholders and senior executives to reconsider their involvement in such demonstrably risky project.

Help us encourage banks like HSBC and BNP Paribas to learn the lessons of Fukushima and invest in safe, sustainable energy by writing to the boards of these international banks and asking them to help us stop a very risky nuclear project in India.

I have just read a Greenpeace announcement that serious consideration is being given to building a nuclear facility near Jaitapur, in an area already known for 'moderate' seismic activity. Although the strongest earthquake in the area to date registered at 'only' 6.2,compared with the 9.0 at Fukushima, it has to be remembered that (quoting a Wikipedia article) the Fukushima plant was 'located in an area designated, on
Japan's seismic risk map, as having a relatively low chance of a large
earthquake and tsunami'. Nuclear power plants tend not to be designed to be especially resistant to earthquakes, and there is no method of anticipating the size of any potential earthquake in the vicinity of Jaitapur.

As an HSBC customer, I would like to ask that proposals for investment in this project be withdrawn and consideration given to investing in more sustainable and significantly less dangerous energy-harnessing projects.

Are these people completely insane?! If it were't so serious an issue (with the potential to cause unimaginable harm to everything and everyone on this planet), I could laugh at their stupidity.

I'm sure I also read something about India being in the process of building the worlds largest nuclear power plant ever - can someone find a source for me.

On the one hand with the dodgy state of the Indian construction industry, combined with corruption on the local and national level, this makes me nervous. Howver it seems somewhat disingenous to criticse the Inidan government for building such facilities, when we're daft enough to be about to build more nuclear power stations in the UK.

Like any large infrastructure projects, unexpected events are by their nature unexpected, and we're perfectly capable of having a serious nuclear accident in the UK. With nuclear being completely unviable without government subsidies, we should be plowing those subsidies into the renewables industry instead. Then perhaps we can tell the Indian goverment that building new nuclear power station, is unacceptable.

HSBC has been contructed to assess and help finding the investor for yet another nuclear plant project in an earthquake zone - Bulgaria's Belene. HSBC's fee will be 47mln Euros. Your campaign needs to include Belene.

"but also triggered an unprecedented man-made tragedy [ the reactor]."

This is utter rubbish. There was no 'tragedy' - Nobody died as a result of the reactor. Zero. Not one person. Nadie. Zilch. Yep a 30 year old plant, of an old design, hit by two of the most terrific forces that nature has to offer and.... no deaths. Let's compare that to 'safe' hydroelectric power where in the last two years ALONE 130+ people have died as a result of dam breaches in Russia and Khasakstan. 

No doubt the design of this new reactor will be Generation 3 - safer still than the three decade old Fukishima reactor. Strangely the ignorant author doesn't mention what type of reactor it is, just that it's Gosh! Horror! Nnnnnnuclear! 

The future's nuclear. E=MC^2 baby. 

 

Follow Greenpeace UK