New Shell CEO halts Arctic drilling

Posted by hayley.baker - 13 July 2012 at 11:03am - Comments
Sylvia Borren enters Shell HQ
All rights reserved. Credit: Greenpeace
Sylvia Borren takes up residency in Shell's board room

Today is an historic day for Shell.

For years, Shell has been investing its money in polluting oil drilling. From the Niger Delta to the Canadian Boreal forests people have to deal with the consequences of our environmentally destructive policies every day. Of course, Shell has said beautiful things about corporate social responsibility, presenting lovely brochures and impressive scenarios for the future. Meanwhile, Shell has expanded its investments in tar sands and Arctic drilling. This has to stop.

This morning at 6.30 as executive director of Greenpeace Netherlands, I have succeeded former Shell CEO Peter Voser. I have taken my place in the international headquarters of Shell here in The Hague. From this day forward, I will radically change our course. After years of misleading statements about sustainability, we will stop talking and start doing it. As the world’s biggest company, we have the responsibility to pass the Earth onto coming generations. That will be my number one mission as new CEO of Shell.

My first move as CEO will be decisive and effective; no drilling for oil in the pristine Arctic. The chance of a major oil spill in that fragile area is enormous. At the same time, our own plans reveal that we are barely able to clean up spilled oil in the Arctic Ocean. That’s why I will call upon our Alaska drilling fleet to withdraw. From this day on, we will invest our billions in renewables: from wind to solar power. Greenpeace will provide to us, at no expense, the knowhow to make the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy.

Our shareholders will welcome this move. The world’s biggest insurance market Lloyds of London and the German bank West LB have publicly announced that Arctic drilling is too dangerous. They warn that the high risks of drilling in the fragile Arctic could end up ruining the fragile ecosystem. This would inevitably have a disastrous impact on our share price. I recognise the concerns about a possible oil spill. A US government institute has also estimated the chance of a major oil spill during the lifetime of an oil rig is one in five. This would be an environmental, as well as a financial catastrophe, if oil were to gush for months unlimited into the region.

The recoverable oil in the offshore reservoirs in the Arctic could supply the planet for only three years. After that, we would still have to make the transition to clean energy. Why postpone the transition to a clean and sustainable future for three years only to endanger a unique ecosystem and risk billions in losses. Numerous energy scenario’s prove that world energy demand can be supplied with clean energy. So why wait? The transition will not take place overnight, but will prove to be possible in the coming decades.

Shell will now take the lead in that transition. We will use our influence to tackle climate change and stop pollution. We will clean up the Niger Delta, and withdraw from the Canadian Boreal forests and the Arctic. No more drilling for new wells. Starting from today, all our billions of dollars will go to renewable energy. Clean energy for a clean future.

We are ready. Let’s go.

Sylvia Borren is the executive director of Greenpeace Netherlands (and since this morning, new CEO of Royal Dutch Shell)

A great new CEO - let's put things right.

Hang in there, Greenpeace.   

The melting sea ice in the Artic is a warning that we need to cure our addiction to oil, not a business opportunity. Shell have a huge responsibility to lead development of renewable energy instead of reckless drilling in such a fragile and hostile environment.

Good to see that Shell now has plans and objectives that take it away from its increasingly unnecessary and dangerous oil fixation.

I'm waiting to see this front page of tomorrows paper before I celebrate.  There's no other coverage on the net....  Almost sounds too good to be true!

Amazing!!! what a break through, I hope he keeps to his words

I really hope that this is not dissinformation!! In an environment where some people dont even believe climate change is a reality, I feel it is very important that Greenpeace supports its cause with honesty and integrity..... this could be really damaging and just add to the fire of you being trouble makers

I am trying to use save arctic toolkit and report an error on it via the Make it better link, but not allowing me to do even though I amsigned in as walrus collective member.

I am trying to report that the link to recruit at the bottom of Sign up friends and family is not working.

 

Please forward to your IT people.

Oh... How sweet this would be.....

I see trees of green........ red roses too
I see em bloom..... for me and you
And I think to myself.... what a wonderful world. 

 

If you look on Greenpeace International, it says Sylvia Borren "symbolically replaced" Peter Voser. I thought this all looked a bit too good to be true! Clever action by Greenpeace, but the way this article communicates it may mislead some people. Shell should indeed take this course of action as enacted by Greenpeace and let's hope for the World's sake and all that they do.

How naive? A leopard cannot change its spots and directors of Greenpeace are not energy experts. Just as matter-based energy (combustion, fission, fusion) is a failure, so too is renewable energy.

Please add a Google+ share button

The issue here is really the reference made by Shell's new CEO concerning the pollution in Nigeria.

You may or not be aware of the fact that there is an ongoing courtcase "Kiobel v.Shell" under which Shell might be considered as criminally liable under the USA Alien Tort Statute.

This case may determine whether US-based and global corporations can be held liable for genocide and other violations of international law.

So, will Shell really live up to expectations and avoid criminal liability?

 

 

 

Follow Greenpeace UK