The pod may be down, but we're not out.

Posted by jamess - 25 September 2010 at 6:57pm - Comments

After 100 incredible hours on Chevron’s anchor chain our occupation is over. The pod has come down. But we’re not leaving Shetland, yet.

I just got back from watching Timo and Naz lower the half-tonne pod, where with help from Victor in the safety boat, they used some more of their rigging magic to safely lower the yellow bubble into the rough seas. From there it was towed, bobbing and rocking, back to its home on the deck of the Esperanza.

Abseiling onto the anchor and stepping into our boat, Timo was bouncing around happy as ever, while Naz’s only wish was to ‘go for a walk’. After three days in eight-foot diameter pod, I think that’s fair enough.

Much as we would have liked to stay in the pod for weeks or even months, when Chevron brought their big money lawyers out to get an injunction against us, we really had no choice but to come down.  We didn’t want to pay hundreds of thousands of pounds of supporter money daily in fines straight into the pockets of an oil giant.

What’s worrying us is Chevron’s reason for the injunction.  They claim hanging on their anchor chain is “a risk to the vessel”, because it prevents them dropping their anchor chain if their thrusters fail.

The job of the eight thrusters on the Stena Carron is to keep the 228-metre drill ship within one metre of a designated spot, so that it can drive a drill into the ground and hunt for oil without the ship moving.  So serving us with an injunction based on the possibility that their thrusters could fail is pretty terrifying.

Think about it. If they’re worried about the ship in the relatively sheltered waters off Lerwick, what does that mean when they’re in the rough seas north of Shetland with a drill stuck in the seabed? What if their thrusters fail then? Would we be facing another Deepwater Horizon catastrophe, this time in UK waters?

**

A few days ago, we asked you – our supporters everywhere – to submit slogan ideas for a pod banner. We had lots of great suggestions, and it was tough to choose just one, but in the end we went for a suggestion on Twitter by Michele Westlake (aka @crazyladywriter) which we think is brilliant.

If you want to know what it says, watch this great little film, which shows that Victor, Anais and Phil had far too much fun making it.

So now we’ve got an excellent new banner, where do we put it? Stayed tuned, the Go Beyond Oil tour ain’t over yet.

-- James on the Esperanza

Why make it sound like a bad thing they have used legal methods to stop you?! You are breaking the law. The law is the law, whether you like it or not. Use legal methods. If someone broke the law to stop you, you'd squeal like babies I notice that the majority of the comments are on here are negative towards Greenpeace, the replies from them seem slow to come forward. Don't you have answers to our queries, Greenpeace?

I have noted that Greenpeace are a hypocritical organisation in the way that they burn so much fuel to achieve next to nothing and that they tell us to stop using oil without the slightest hint of how this should be done nor offering alternatives. Yet, when Stena take you to court AND WIN in the name of safety, you call them hypocritical. Lets face it, the anchor is there as a final safety measure, yet your people claim that disabling this measure is 'totally safe' - near everything that you say is total boll***s. I do not imagine that anyone would not prefer to stop using oil and having to drill for more and more every day, but the fact is that without this oil we would be back to 'caveman' living until a suitable alternative is found. I've even bought myself a top of the range magic wand and been waving it for weeks and yet no solution has come up yet. I guess that that the £ and $ being spent to find a suitable and workable alternative are not enough for you? If i pulled a dangerous stunt like you did on the Stena Don, then again on the Stena Carron in a city on someones car, the law would find a good reason to pick me up and put me in jail, it's about time that this country stopped turning a blind eye to your dangerous antics and stopped you from harrassing companies going about their legitimate and legal business. You don't have to like their business, but please accept that it is legal, cantrary to your actions (else why was an injunction granted?). I have never seen a genuine answer to any question that mentions safety on any of your blogs, yet you always claim that your 'stunts/ operations' are totally safe. Please stop endangering the lives of hundreds with your illegal activities.

Honestly believe what you have done is good? Endangering the safety of the ship with your stupidity? Had something happened, TRUE HERO, Lerwick lifeboat and OscarCharlie's crew would have had to risk their lives to save you! How much research have you done into this? Shetlands waters are dangerous for ANY ship? The protesters who sat in the pod for "3 days", (or for a couple of hours each shift thanks to crew changes) where was the Esperanza incase something happend? Steaming around OUTSIDE harbour limits, WASTING fuel because your too CHEAP to pay harbour fees. To cheap to pay a litte! the total cost of this stunt? who knows? It doesn't just affect the Oil companies, but the services that were on standby, all other cost, hire of guard ships by OUR harbour for YOUR safety. And what may i ask are you going to give back to our community for the cost or your stunt. I bullshit speech no doubt of how brave Greenpeace are. Trouble making, dangerous, beggers who waste the time and money of everyone else!

Follow Greenpeace UK