Shutting the door on tar sands fuel in Europe

Posted by Charlie Kronick - 14 October 2011 at 5:15pm - Comments
Greenpeace supporters deliver messages protesting about tar sands to Whitehall

Last week, the European Commission announced a key change to legislation that could virtually stop the import of fuel made from tar sands into the EU. If it becomes law, it would make tar sands projects an even more risky bet for energy companies and investors.

Specifically, they hope to include a “reference value” for tar sands in a key piece of European law, the Fuel Quality Directive, which aims to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases released by our fuel, not just from exhaust pipes but during production as well. It sounds obscure - and it is - but it would all but close the European Union as a market for fuel derived from tar sands. Despite this, the UK Government is lobbying other EU member states to oppose this really positive piece of legislation, but it looks like the word is finally beginning to get out: step by step, it is possible to go beyond oil.

It really is the issue of the moment. Last month, hundreds of activists – including Hollywood stars and high school students - were arrested outside the White House in protests to stop the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry tar sands crude form Canada through the heart of America to the refineries on the Gulf Coast of Texas for export to Europe. Approval for the construction of the pipeline was seen as a dead certainty, but concerns over leaks from the pipeline running through one of the key clean water supplies for the American Midwest, as well as other environmental issues have a cast a huge shadow over the decision to be taken by the Obama administration.

It just might be that the tide is beginning to turn.  Two key factors, part of laws being drafted thousands of miles apart - in Brussels, Washington, D.C. and Omaha, Nebraska - could spell the end for tar sands, one of the dirtiest fuels on the planet. If demand from Europe for tar sands oil evaporates, then the Keystone pipeline looks far less attractive.

This is a defining moment – we’ve got a real chance to make sure we keep one of the world’s most damaging fuels out of Europe.

Check this http://t.co/MVQrQ67Q

You'll see that the EROEI for Alberta tar sands is just 5.8:1 and the author - a very well respected energy analyst - comes to a reassuring conclusion about the future of this horrid business.

Here's hoping we can stop the UK blocking the Fuel Quality Directive.  See what happened last week when Canada and the UK met to scheme over blocking EU climate policy! Its pretty saucy ;)

“Oil Orgy” invades Energy Summit

http://www.no-tar-sands.org/2011/10/illicit-%E2%80%9Coil-orgy%E2%80%9D/

 

GET THOSE GREENPEACE CARDS TO NORMAN BAKER MP & PRESSURE YOUR LOCAL MPs- & PREPARE YOUR REGIONAL MEPs NOW!!!

hi, i know this isnt completely related to this story but i didnt know were to say it, i had what i think of as a good idea today and iv set up a petition for the government to get serious on there website, its called environmental bail out and petitions the government to sure up and sell the financial institutions it bailed out and sell them using the money from the sales to fit solar panels and a small wind turbine to the roofs of every house in britain! this would save everybody a lot of money, save the environment and also the economy by reducing our reliance on fossil fuels from other countries, reducing our emmisions and saving everybody money that they could spend or save to sure up the economy for everybody except the greedy energy firms, people could even pay some of the cost of the turbine and solar panels of  at a low rate which would still be lower than there energy bills i just cant see any reasons other than financial greed and wanting to keep shareholders of energy firms happy that go against this idea what do you think, will you sign it? this could be a chance for britain to leed the way in reducing emmisions!!! thanks for reading

Sounds like a cool plan. Sadly, I think the risk associated with the banks which have been bailed is so high that private investors are unlikely to be interested right now - after all, that's why they were bailed out in the first place, because they couldn't stay afloat in the marketplace. But getting more investment into renewnable energy is a sound plan!

Follow Greenpeace UK