Amazon gets smaller as deforestation rates rise

Posted by jamie — 25 January 2008 at 4:21pm - Comments

Last year, we heard the excellent news that the rate of deforestation in the Amazon had dropped for the third consecutive year. However, yesterday came the rather less welcome news that those rates had changed and have moved in an upward direction.

Figures for August to December 2007 show that the rate of destruction has now doubled to new record levels, and although this is only preliminary data, it indicates that figures for the year overall will probably be very high. It shouldn't come as a surprise, though - many experts, including our own Amazon team, have been warning that increased prices for products like soya and beef have been tempting farmers to clear more rainforest and that without a concerted effort from the Brazilian government, an increase in deforestation was inevitable.

As Greenpeace Brazil's Paulo Adario told the Guardian, even though Brazil's President Lula da Silva's government has had some success in tackling deforestation the Amazon, "what the government does not control is the economic reality. It is the economy that controls deforestation. Each time the prices of meat and soy rise so does deforestation.

It seems we still have a long way to go before deforestation in the Amazon is a thing of the past.

Hi Raz,

Both you and BYG are right - there needs to be more incentives on offer to protect forests. Demand from developed nations for soya, beef, palm oil, timber - all the things that forests are cleared to farm and sell - is often the biggest cause of deforestation. So the reasons to preserve forests have to outweigh the reasons to chop 'em down, and it can't just be the responsibility of those forest nations such as Brazil and Indonesia. Plenty of noise has been made from countries like Norway (thanks for the tip on the story, I hadn't spotted that!) about providing financial aid or something similar to protect forests, but it also requires the right mechanisms and safeguards to make sure such aid does what it's supposed to.

In case you missed it, at the Bali conference last month we launched a proposal for just such a mechanism. It's very complex and weighty, but hopefully my summary makes some kind of sense.

web editor
gpuk

Hi Raz, Both you and BYG are right - there needs to be more incentives on offer to protect forests. Demand from developed nations for soya, beef, palm oil, timber - all the things that forests are cleared to farm and sell - is often the biggest cause of deforestation. So the reasons to preserve forests have to outweigh the reasons to chop 'em down, and it can't just be the responsibility of those forest nations such as Brazil and Indonesia. Plenty of noise has been made from countries like Norway (thanks for the tip on the story, I hadn't spotted that!) about providing financial aid or something similar to protect forests, but it also requires the right mechanisms and safeguards to make sure such aid does what it's supposed to. In case you missed it, at the Bali conference last month we launched a proposal for just such a mechanism. It's very complex and weighty, but hopefully my summary makes some kind of sense. web editor gpuk

About Jamie

I'm a forests campaigner working mainly on Indonesia. My personal mumblings can be found @shrinkydinky.

Follow Greenpeace UK