Wanted: your ideas to save species from extinction

Posted by jamie - 8 September 2010 at 7:00pm - 14 Comments

By every measurable factor, biodiversity is up the creek with no sign of getting a paddle any time soon. International attempts to reverse the downward trend of species numbers through the Convention on Biological Diversity have failed, and the goals set by the CBD for this year have been missed.

As my colleague David Ritter notes on Global Policy: "This dismal assessment is of course not the fault of ... the CBD itself, but the parties to the Convention, namely the nations of the world. Indeed the CBD is an institution of obvious weakness, hostage always to national capitals and wider power politics. The CBD possesses no power to compel compliance or punish non-compliance."

Yet it would be absurd to give up the hope that something other than cockroaches and Japanese knot weed will be saved from the bonfire of the species we've ignited and fuelled. So the Biodiversity 100 campaign is an excellent opportunity to attempt something practical.

The idea, as explained by George Monbiot, is to compile a list of practical steps individual nations can take to stem the loss of biodiversity under their jurisdiction, outside the unwieldy architecture of international agreements. It's a rallying cry, a challenge and an affirmative action all in one. And everyone can contribute.

Use the form on the Guardian's website to submit your bright ideas which should be challenging and ambitious. No easy measures here, we need to think big. And ideally, it should be backed up with solid peer-reviewed science so provide references if you can.

If you're stuck for an idea to submit, here are a few we prepared earlier which would go a long way to helping our various campaigns. You'll need to select which country is responsible for taking action, so you could submit an idea asking:

  • all Arctic countries (the US, Canada, Russia, and various EU ones) to impose a moratorium on oil drilling in the frozen north, where a spill would be disastrous for whales, narwhals, dolphins, polar bears and bird breeding colonies and take far longer to clear up than in the Gulf of Mexico;
  • EU countries to implement a 'no take' (ie no fishing) policy for the most commercially endangered species in European waters, such as Atlantic bluefin tuna and North Sea cod;
  • the UK and other EU countries to ban bottom and beam trawling in their national waters which would reduce the amount of bycatch and help safeguard marine ecosystems such as cold water coral reefs and hydrothermal vents;
  • while we're at it, they could ban fish aggregating devices as well which contribute to the overfishing of many fish species;
  • EU countries to add a penalty system to the illegal timber legislation recently voted through the European parliament, so there are proper disincentives to importing timber which has been produced by destroying the rainforests of south-east Asia and central Africa;
  • and one for Indonesia: extend the proposed moratorium on deforestation and peatland clearance to include existing concessions granted to palm oil and paper companies like Sinar Mas, not just new concessions.

The preservation of one species or ecosystem does not compensate for the loss of another, but that doesn't mean we can't step in where the CBD has so spectacularly failed. Here's an opportunity to change that.

while your point are valid and I agree with them; please take off cruise control.

For a start, we in the UK can improve our shameful air quality; which is failing EU legeslation badly and is causing the EU to seriously consider imposing "significant" fines to the tune of hundreds of millions.

Any attempt to promote a greated biodiversity in the UK would be worthless if it were met with untold quantities of Nitrgen Dioxide, Sulphur Dioxide and Particulate Matter, to kill of any species you are trying to protect.

You're right, the UK does need to improve it's air quality - is that merely a case, do you think, of reducing the levels of cars on the roads and upping public transport? (That can only help!) Or is it something altogether more complex and widespread, such as the use of fuel, transport, pesticides used in farming, chemicals in the water supply, amount of trees etc..?

By the way, thanks, Greenpeace, for this post. It is so highly applicable to recent events in the gulf, and the plight of the dwarf seahorse. It's great that you're taking this stand - and great that the Guardian are reporting these cases! Lets get change to happen.

I think it's down to mostly reducing the levels of vehicles on the road since road traffic accounts for around 24% of the total emissions of the UK. But this would need to be coupled with a drastic improvement in the public transport service; it's much overlooked as a solution to environmental problems, but I think making public transport a more pleasent way to travel would make a huge difference. I don't know about anywhere else but here in Scotland, rail staff are downright horrible to people on the train, young people especially.

Don't get me wrong, you would still need to take a good hard look at how we generate our energy and we are making some great progress into sustainable energy (see the Greenpeace blog post from earlier).

Pesticides, I would say, are not as big of a problem for air quality as Industry or Transport but would need looked at; they are more of a problem to water bodies and species in them.

Love the frog by the way, just thought I'd say :) Could probably kill you with its pinkie toe but.

1. WE NEED TO GET THE WORLD POPULATION UNDER CONTROL AND BRING IT DOWN TO SUSTAINABLE LEVEL.
2 BUY OR GROW MORE LOCAL PRODUCE.
3. USE THE CAR LESS AND WALK MORE.
4.STOP WASTEING AND START CONSERVING.
5 RESPECT THE EARTH AND ALL THAT LIVE THERE ON.
6 TRY GOING OFF THE GRID.
7 AND WE SHOULD REAMBRACE NATURE AND STOP THINKING THAT WE ARE SOME WHAT DIFFERENT FROM THE REST OF THE NATURAL WORLD.

while your point are valid and I agree with them; please take off cruise control.

For a start, we in the UK can improve our shameful air quality; which is failing EU legeslation badly and is causing the EU to seriously consider imposing "significant" fines to the tune of hundreds of millions. Any attempt to promote a greated biodiversity in the UK would be worthless if it were met with untold quantities of Nitrgen Dioxide, Sulphur Dioxide and Particulate Matter, to kill of any species you are trying to protect.

You're right, the UK does need to improve it's air quality - is that merely a case, do you think, of reducing the levels of cars on the roads and upping public transport? (That can only help!) Or is it something altogether more complex and widespread, such as the use of fuel, transport, pesticides used in farming, chemicals in the water supply, amount of trees etc..? By the way, thanks, Greenpeace, for this post. It is so highly applicable to recent events in the gulf, and the plight of the dwarf seahorse. It's great that you're taking this stand - and great that the Guardian are reporting these cases! Lets get change to happen.

I think it's down to mostly reducing the levels of vehicles on the road since road traffic accounts for around 24% of the total emissions of the UK. But this would need to be coupled with a drastic improvement in the public transport service; it's much overlooked as a solution to environmental problems, but I think making public transport a more pleasent way to travel would make a huge difference. I don't know about anywhere else but here in Scotland, rail staff are downright horrible to people on the train, young people especially. Don't get me wrong, you would still need to take a good hard look at how we generate our energy and we are making some great progress into sustainable energy (see the Greenpeace blog post from earlier). Pesticides, I would say, are not as big of a problem for air quality as Industry or Transport but would need looked at; they are more of a problem to water bodies and species in them. Love the frog by the way, just thought I'd say :) Could probably kill you with its pinkie toe but.

1. WE NEED TO GET THE WORLD POPULATION UNDER CONTROL AND BRING IT DOWN TO SUSTAINABLE LEVEL. 2 BUY OR GROW MORE LOCAL PRODUCE. 3. USE THE CAR LESS AND WALK MORE. 4.STOP WASTEING AND START CONSERVING. 5 RESPECT THE EARTH AND ALL THAT LIVE THERE ON. 6 TRY GOING OFF THE GRID. 7 AND WE SHOULD REAMBRACE NATURE AND STOP THINKING THAT WE ARE SOME WHAT DIFFERENT FROM THE REST OF THE NATURAL WORLD.

Without undermining the work being done by many organisations (without them we'd probably have nothing left), i feel some schemes could be supported better. We need to encourage the masses - not just you and i who obviously are aware - Just a couple of shopping examples: FSC - Great but companies have to volunteer to join. Try Googling for furniture, LOADS of companies with no certification whatsoever or any care. I know 'cos i phoned up many of them - none that i called, could produce any cert at all, one didnt know what FSC meant. These companies are selling masses of unsustainable furniture to the masses because it is cheap. This is the downfall of illegal timber. Sadly the masses mainly put money before ethics, so hard action must be taken. FSC themselves told me to ask the company why they don't have certification - NONSENSE WAKE UP!!!!! Also the FSC database which i was guided to, is completely useless for finding furniture - i am still looking for a sustainable wardrobe at a reasonable price without their help. MSC Fish - Again a great scheme but needs en mass support from supermarkets and retailers - they have to take initiative on our behalf. When i go to my local Asda or Tesco the fish section has some MSC fish if you are lucky - you could buy a MSC kipper and MSC salmon all the rest is not MSC - I want this reversed to if not 100% then 90% MSC to choose from. Half hearted effort from the people that have the monopoly on shopping in the UK. Oh i can sometimes get fish labelled 'responsibly sourced' from Youngs but it will contain Palm Oil as a little bonus for buying 'green' but no-one except me knows that one do they? Please try these shopping experiences for yourselves - oh you must do this everyday for yourselves, surely, so you can see what i mean? Consumerism is at the fore front of much of our planet's destruction - why can't anyone see that this HAS to change.

YOU ARE RIGHT THAT CONSUMERISM IS WHY MOST OF OUR PLANET IS IN RUINS.AS LONG AS THERE IS A SUPPLY AND DEMAND FOR NEW PRODUCTS AND NEW MATERIALS THEN THING AS THERE ARE WON'T CHANGE. THE WORLD NEEDS TO HAVE A COMPLETE CHANGE ON HOW WE VIEW THE ENVIROMENT.WE MUST START MORE CONSERVERING AND USEING LESS VIRGIN MATERIALS.ALSO PEOPLE SHOULD BE MORE AWARE ABOUT THE 3R'S REDUSE RECYLE AND REUSE.THEN THINGS MIGHT IMPROVE BUT UNTIL THEN THE ENVIROMENT AND THE PLANET WILL GET WORSER.

I think firstly the government should ban all extensions to runways in the UK the last thing we need is to destroy all our green spaces with a concrete carpet. Also why not limit households to one car per family with financial penalties to those who wish to run more. This money could be put into organic urban farm schemes enabling fresh local produce to become readily available in citys and also reduce emisssions in the transportation sector. Grants could also be given to farmers for encouraging wildlife as they are in rural areas.

     All very interesting, maybe we all could make a difference by changing our insatiable appetite for goods from all over the world. More locally produced produce would be a great help, I'm sure most people know this already and I would hate to think I'm stating the obvious but we would do well to take baby steps and teach our children and future generations that our planet can't cope unless we change our ways of living.

     It's hard to know where to start but we should at least make a start and build on it from generation to generation, hoping that each generation can improve the way of life for the benefit of all of us and those generations still to come.

      If there were no money in the world then we could all help each other because we need to rather than just for profit. Governments from all over the world need a more unifying currency, what that would be I'm not really sure but what a challenge..!!! Lets set aside all our differences and join together to find a much more sustainable way for everyone.