Cold, wet, scary - and worth it

Posted by Cat - 14 May 2007 at 3:56pm - Comments

Cat manages to keep afloat

Follow the crew of the Arctic Sunrise on their campaign for Marine Reserves in our North Sea Tour blog

So, what is it like floating in the North Sea in the path of a fishing vessel? Wet. And salty. No, really. I was so concerned with making sure the photographer could see my 'STOP - Cod in Crisis' sign, and trying not to swallow too much seawater, that I forgot all about the fishing boat with its big steel cables towing its huge trawl net behind me. I'd stopped being scared - all the fear came beforehand.

The night before, as I was laying out my warm gear and survival suit (a warm waterproof suit designed to keep people alive if they have to abandon ship into freezing waters), I went over all the things that could go wrong and what I could do to avoid them. If I can choose the way I leave this life it sure as hell won't be by drowning in the North Sea. Even lower on my list would be being caught in a fishing net with the cod I'm trying to save!

I barely slept - I never sleep well before an action, so I was almost relieved when our 6am wake-up call came. I was too nervous to eat and didn't want to drink as, once I was zipped in my suit, a toilet trip was out of the question. I tried everything to reassure myself - I reminded myself that Greenpeace had done similar things before, and that the boat teams were trained, experienced and ready to pluck me from the water if things got dangerous. It didn't do much to calm my nerves.

Once we were in the RIBs (rigid inflatable boats) and heading towards the Endurance and her fishing net, I asked myself again, "What on earth am I doing here?" It was just more nerves, and I knew the answer. I've done a lot of actions with Greenpeace, but this one was particularly close to my heart.

I've spent years working with supermarkets to try to get them to buy their fish from sustainable sources, I've talked to fishermen and politicians about better ways to manage our fisheries, and I've even stopped eating fish. I just want to make sure I have done everything I can to ensure our future includes healthy oceans full of a vast array of marine life and healthy fisheries around the world.

Getting cold, wet and scared is worth it, if it means we can save what's left of the North Sea cod.

Hey Cat,
Well done!!! Facing that massive ship and those cables looming in the waves... very brave, awesome images/YouTube film! Seems "slightly" uncomfortable there, pfew, that's a rather vulnerable place to be, compliments for taking the plunge!
Finally getting some media attention now as well, let's hope a spin-off starts and politicians and industry start paying attention...
Wish I could be there with you - seeing the Sunrise bobbin' in the background and the RIBs at work makes me wanna be back onboard! Pls. say hello to crew from me. Hey, keep up the good work, best wishes for the rest of campaign!
Tess (out at sea today as well - on a ferry back home... ;-(

The North Sea looks bloody cold, so well done and hope the survival suit was warm and toasty.

What did the fishing ship do? and how about the crew on board?

I haven't yet seen the You Tube footage but I'll go look it up.

and again to everyone out on the North Sea standing up for something they believe in, good luck with the next action and a job well done.

Did you ever think about the safety of the men on board these boats!!!

As a Shetlander with friends and relatives on fishing boats and the RNLI lifeboats (which would be called into action should your stunt have gone wrong) I am dismayed to see such disregard to the safety of everyone involved

Fishing is, by its nature, a dangerous job, without 'well meaning' people jumping overboard into the path of a boat which is in mid trawl

The strain involved in towing a trawl net is huge, and any sudden changes in course are likely to have unpredictable and/or disasterous consequences

In light of the recent Bourbon Dolphin tragedy, which was caused by a tow which went wrong, I think your actions are grossly insensitive

The problem of overfishing is well known and in the hands of the legislative. Believe me when I say the people of Shetland are the first to support sustainable fisheries, but I think that puplic opinion in Shetland is not behind you when you employ such foolhardy methods which endanger lives

I hope you do not put the lives of fishermen, emergency service crew and your own at risk again

You can find the film here - feel the cold!

web editor
gpuk

One of our core principles is that our campaigning is non-violent, which means we don't put anyone, other people or our own, in jeopardy. The team onboard the Arctic Sunrise is extremely experienced in carrying out marine actions and if they'd thought there was any chance that things could go wrong, they wouldn't have gone ahead.

But leaving the future of the fishing industry (and the fish it depends on) up to legislators is clearly not working, which is why marine life across the globe is in the sorry state we see it now. As our campaigner Willie has pointed out, advice to massively reduce cod fishing quotas has been repeatedly ignored. Sadly, merely supporting sustainable fishing isn't enough if your friends and relatives aren't actually doing something about it. If you'd like to cite some concrete examples of how cod fishermen are working to safeguard stocks, please feel free to respond.

That's why we engage in these forms of direct action, so we can prevent bad environmental practices happening, even if only for a short time. In this case, leaving it up to politicians and the vested interests of the fishing industry lobbyists isn't an option.

web editor
gpuk

I think you are dangerously misguided to believe there wasn't "any chance that things could go wrong" by putting a person into the North Sea in the path of oncoming boats mid-trawl. That is a very, very hazardous thing to be doing, and to say otherwise is irresponsible. Remember that there were a huge number of factors out-with the control of your crew. When things go wrong at sea, they tend to go very wrong, very quickly

You state that the crew of the Arctic Sunrise are "extremely experienced in carrying out marine actions". However, ask the coastguard, RNLI, helicopter rescue crews and other far more experienced seafarers what their risk assessment of the situation was and I'm sure they won't agree with you

It is also naive, and probably insulting to many, to suggest that Shetland fishermen "aren't actually doing something about it". Fishing is the lifeblood of Shetland, and fisheries are acutely important to the future of our islands. If you aren't aware of the work done by the Shetland Fisherman's Association, I humbly suggest that you haven't done your homework

You point out that the fishing industry lobbyists have vested interests. Indeed they do; interests in achieving a sustainable fishing industry. I'm afraid that tying up the fishing fleet for several years until cod stocks have recovered is not an option in a place such as Shetland with an already fragile economy

If that is indeed what you are proposing, what is your suggestions as to the economic future of fishing communities?

In general, I support Greenpeace in their attempts to highlight environmental issues. But I think this campaign will achieve little other that to alienate the fishing industry through your apparent attitude that you know better and care more

Having read the comments of jamie, above, re experienced crew, etc.. I feel that I should now do as is suggested on another GP page, and, I [quote]:
Write to David Miliband and tell him our oceans need marine reserves. [/end quote]

Yes our oceans do need marine reserves...
Special, very small areas, where Greenpeace can be taken to and scuttled before they put more lives at risk.
So I will write to Mr Milliband and suggest that he uses any influence he has to instigate an investigation into the dangerous practices, and cavalier attitude towards maritime safety, of Greenpeace.

"That's why we engage in these forms of direct action, so we can prevent bad environmental practices happening, even if only for a short time."

And have you? I think not. Those were disgraceful actions. A bit of respect shown for the crew of the Bourbon Dolphin, would go a long way.

"The team onboard the Arctic Sunrise is extremely experienced in carrying out marine actions and if they'd thought there was any chance that things could go wrong, they wouldn't have gone ahead."

I'm sorry but jumping into the North Sea in any situation is extremely dangerous, not to mention obstructing a towing fishing vessel; there is so much room for error it is unthinkable. As much as your team may be experienced, they have no way of knowing how the fishing vessel was going to react. There are too many unknowns and room for error.

Well done green peace you've achieved absolutely nothing but making yourselves look even more reckless.

I may support the cause, but certainly not green peace. You've lost a lot of people's support over this stupid incident.

Time to grow up…

The more interesting questions on the marine environment and the fishing industry are being discussed on this thread - but here I’ll respond to the people who are more concerned about our tactics and claim that our actions in the North Sea are dangerous.

We have about thirty offices around the world, all doing direct actions on a regular basis, and after every one representatives or sympathisers with the target industry or organisation claim that we are recklessly putting people’s lives at risk. So, if so many people are telling us this, why aren’t Greenpeace listening?

Well, we always respond that we plan these things very carefully in accordance with our core principle of non-violence so that no-one, neither our activists nor the target nor any third parties, are put at risk. We exist to change opinions, and we’re fully aware that deaths or serious injuries wouldn’t help our cause.

So who do you believe? Well, fortunately it doesn’t have to come down to trust – using the internet, anyone can pretty easily find out how often activists and others are killed or seriously injured on Greenpeace actions. Have a look for yourself, then see if you can find any job, occupation or hobby which is safer, statistically, than taking part in a Greenpeace action.

If you still maintain that we are irresponsibly reckless, and the lack of accidents is merely down to a thirty year lucky streak, well, perhaps we’ve got someone watching over us.

Graham
gpuk

OK Green Peace; publish the safety plan.

Lets see your safety plan and all the organisation that went into contacting the costguard, other emergency services and fishing vessels involved.

You obviously must have calculations and coordinates etc. you used before jumping in the water?

Oh and the plan sent to the other vessels in proximity....

I'm still interested in what you have to say about the insensitive timing? i.e. the Bourbon Dolpin.

I am utterly disgusted with your harrasment of the trawlers in the northern north sea last week. You obviously are extremely misguided or are so far up yourselves that you can't see or won't see the facts in front of you. As for catching the last Cod it won't happen in your lifetime or mine either especially as mine might be longer than yours if you continue to do silly stunts like you have been !
If you want to save Cod, go harass the industrial fishermen who take the feed away to feed a few pigs and farmed fish, go cull a few thousand sick and diseased grey seals or is that too much of a taboo subject and wouldn't get you any brownie points with the bunny hugging public.
Donate to Greenpeace ? You must be joking

Er, no.

web editor
gpuk

Follow Greenpeace UK