To farm or not to farm?

Posted by jossc - 16 May 2007 at 2:51pm - Comments

50 percent of fresh supermarket fish comes from farms

50 per cent of fresh fish sold in supermarkets comes from farms

One obvious response to the disappearance of wild fish from our seas is "Why don’t we replace them with farmed varieties. We do it with land animals, so why not fish?" Of course this is already happening – over 40 per cent of the world's fish production already comes from aquaculture, and 50 per cent of fish sold in UK supermarkets comes from farms. These pen-reared fish grow at a phenomenal rate. For example, wild cod double in size every year, but hatchery cod quadruple in the same period. Given that size determines reproductive rate, at first glance this could be a solution to repopulating wild stocks.

Problem is, the methods used in most fish farms are not sustainable and put enormous pressure on the surrounding wildlife and environment. How? Well, the biggest growth area for fish farming is in high-value carnivorous species like salmon, shrimp, and in recent years cod, which are fed on fishmeal and fish oil from wild-caught small fish. On average you need around 3 tonnes of these wild fish to produce a tonne of farmed salmon, and the ratio's even higher for shrimp. This means that farms need to take such vast amounts of wild small fry from the sea that repopulating wild stocks with farmed fish will never be possible. Taking so much wild fish to feed farmed stocks is depriving whales, dolphins, birds, and other fish of a key part of their diet. It can also have devasting effects on coastal communities by depriving them of a much needed food source. This is particularly true in developing countries, where the fish are farmed mainly for export.

There's more - the high levels of antibiotics and pesticides used to control diseases in farmed fish have a polluting effect on surrounding habitats, while the diseases themselves often spread to wild populations. Excess food and untreated wastes from farms also find their way into the wider environment, raising nutrient levels and causing algal blooms which can de-oxygenate large areas of ocean.

Finally there's genetic pollution. Wild fish survive because they are resistant to disease, skilled at hunting and avoiding predators, and responsive to changes in water temperature which tell them when to migrate at spawning time. Farmed fish lose these characteristics within a few generations – this doesn't matter when they spend their lives in a pen, but if they escape (as some inevitably will) and breed with wildfish they will pass on "bad genes" to any offspring, and these defective fish may flourish or even come to dominate in the wild.

So aquaculture can't be a solution to repopulating our oceans. For that, we're going to need marine reserves - and a lot of time.

I did notice you said most fish are farmed in a non-sustainable way, but I'd like to point out the "No Catch" farmed Cod, produced by Johnson Seafarms in Shetland.
They are only fed on the leftovers from fish caught for human consumption, which would otherwise just go for fishmeal, or whatever.
Do you consider this kind of aquaculture to be sustainable, given that it does not necessitate the catching of wild fish to maintain the farming venture.??
If I am right, and as I also believe that they don't use antibiotics, chemicals, etc.. would this be the type of aquaculture venture that you would be prepared to back, against the ones which as you rightly say are non-sustainable.
I believe that to make a difference we have to not only criticise what is wrong, but praise what is right.

Cheers,
Robbie
PS. I have nothing to do with the company, I just like their methods.. :-)

Hi Robbie,

you're absolutely spot on that we should be praising and encouraging good practice as well as criticising the bad guys, and as far as we can tell, the "No Catch" cod farmers are doing a lot right in the way they are going about things. So much so that we've included them on our page of better buys, where we offer advice on how to ensure that the seafood you buy is sustainable. No Catch are certainly taking a lot of precautions to minimise the environmental impact of their farms.

Best practice doesn't necesarily mean sustainable, though. Farming carnivorous fish will always be fundamentally unsustainable as long as they require three times their own weight in wild-caught fish to fatten them for sale. "No Catch" can feed leftover fish to their stock while their operation is small-scale, but it will be harder to source such feed as the industry expands. The only aquaculture solution likely to be sustainable in the long term involves farming herbivorous fish such as carp, tilapia, and barramundi - since plant eaters don't need to be fed with fishmeal.

In the UK these fish also tend to be farmed in enclosed ponds and have a lower impact on the surrounding environment. Of course, the real solution is to restock our seas with healthy wild fish by creating marine reserves where they can recover from years of over-fishing and pollution...

The worrying thing is that the sentiment of this article is as true as ever. Not enough is being done to stop this.

The food that they normally eat in the wild converts into powerful omega 3s for us; the farm raised salmon doesn't have as high nutritional value.

Wild Fishes have become a rare variety. The obvious reason to the disappearance of wild fish from our seas is "Why don’t we replace them with farmed varieties. We do it with land animals, so why not fish?" wells fargo on line

The bussiness opportunity in aquaculture is tremendous. It is a new knowledge for me that "over 40 per cent of the world's fish production already comes from aquaculture, and 50 per cent of fish sold in UK supermarkets comes from farms". Thanks for the information.

Kohler engine repair

The worrying thing is that the sentiment of this article is as true as ever. Not enough is being done to stop this.

The food that they normally eat in the wild converts into powerful omega 3s for us; the farm raised salmon doesn't have as high nutritional value.

Wild Fishes have become a rare variety. The obvious reason to the disappearance of wild fish from our seas is "Why don’t we replace them with farmed varieties. We do it with land animals, so why not fish?" wells fargo on line

The bussiness opportunity in aquaculture is tremendous. It is a new knowledge for me that "over 40 per cent of the world's fish production already comes from aquaculture, and 50 per cent of fish sold in UK supermarkets comes from farms". Thanks for the information. Kohler engine repair

I know plenty of people who ask the question . . .If we can essentially "grow" our own fish, why can't we just "restock" nature? Seems easy enough. It's not though. And this post has done an excellent job of stating the reason why this is not as easy as it sounds. While farm raised fish is an excellent source of sustainable resources for your neighborhood seafood restaurant, it falls tragically short when replenishing wild resources is considered. Having the correct information is the only way we will truly be able to devise a suitable strategy for solving this problem. Thank you for educating people, and for pointing us in the right direction.

I think the farm idea is to have fresh food. In this case seems that the industrialization have a huge effect and the fishes can affect the people health. The nature is the only able to provide organic food. [url=http://www.predealcazare.ro]cazare predeal[/url]

Follow Greenpeace UK