Who holds the UK fish pie? We’d all like to know.

Posted by Ariana Densham — 5 March 2013 at 6:34pm - Comments
All rights reserved. Credit: © David Sandison, Greenpeace
Sustainably caught wild bass, Newlyn

When did the world of fish become so secretive, and why? This is a question that I have been thinking about a lot recently, and which was today also questioned by The Times

A key feature about the fishing industry in this country is that the right to fish is considered a national asset. It is held on trust by the UK government on behalf of you and me.

Someone who wants to fish, and to hold fishing quota, must get a licence from the fishing authorities to do so. This licence allows you to exploit this national asset. It does not give you ownership of the asset.

The problem is that for many years, no one has been able to find out where all the fishing quota is, and whether it’s in the hands of working fishermen or not. If quota is a public asset, then why has this been such a problem? And why don’t we know who holds it?

Transparency around fishing quota would also go a long way to alleviate stories on the rumour mill that big brands such as Manchester United and the Royal Bank of Scotland have held or traded quota.

You’ll be heartened to hear then, as was I, that the UK government in a determined move, has committed to pulling together a register of quota holders by the end of 2013, having recognised the current situation is ‘bizarre’. Our fisheries minister Richard Benyon should be applauded for leading the charge on this.

What is really odd then, is that the government’s own marine and fishing arm – the Marine Management Organisation (MMO), which is most in the know about where all the quota is – refuses to recognise that there should be transparency. It claims that this information is too ‘sensitive,’ and that making it public would harm the industry. In short, they claim that the public interest is not great enough.

This regressive, non-transparent position of the MMO is seen as ‘deeply worrying’ by shadow fisheries minister Tom Harris. And I agree.

How can Defra be saying one thing, but its own fishing arm is saying the complete opposite? Feels to me like there must be some very powerful corporate interests lobbying the MMO to keep things secret.

This is not surprising given that the MMO on its watch, has seen large chunks of UK fishing quota fall into the hands of powerful foreign fishing interests, as we exposed last month. Many of these foreign fishing interests use UK fishing quota but land their fish in foreign ports with little or no economic benefit to this country.  

There is a growing public interest to know who holds fishing quota. Our fisheries minister needs to stand firm against those corporate interests that fear transparency – they clearly have something to hide.

I look forward to the day that the fishing industry embraces transparency. It would benefit everyone. Ultimately though, the public has the right to know who is exploiting one of our greatest national assets. 

THIS is another example of the deep seated corruption at the core of our society and illustrates the pointlessness of British democracy where vested interests can operate under the covers with the support year in and year out historically of our elected members.

Others right under our noses"commercial confidentiality"; the immunity from prosecution of financial the banksters,1000 pages of planning reduced to 50 for the benefit of developers and anti environmentalists,the attack on village greens and local planning authorities in "The Growth & Infrastructure Bill"; the shame docility with which secret courts are now being legislated and which put some direct actions at risk .

AND so it goes...  

About Ariana

Hi
I’m Ariana and I’m an campaigner in the Oceans team at Greenpeace UK.  

Still
interested? Follow me on twitter @arianadensham

 

Other posts by this author

Follow Greenpeace UK