I don't
know what's made Apple post
the iPhone 3G's Environmental Status Report but it's definitely a step in the
right direction. Maybe Apple Chief Steve Jobs read my
blog and decided to act before our scientists got their hands and screwdrivers on his
latest phone. While the new iPhone has less polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and
Brominated Flame Retardants (BFR) than the original one, Apple has yet to eliminate these and other harmful substances like antimony,
beryllium and phthalates.
Making phones without any PVC or BFR isn't a problem for Sony Ericsson and Nokia so why is Apple lagging behind? The iPhone in my opinion is a very stylish handset that scores high on usability and enjoys a cult following judging from the queues to buy it. It's a pity that it's not as green as the others when there's no reason why it couldn't be. Apple has promised to get rid of PVC and BFRs by the end of this year though. Let's see if they fulfil it.
