Also by christian

Forest offsets – overhyped, unverified and over there...

Posted by christian - 16 October 2009 at 12:25pm - Comments

Can you balance coal power with forests? Not based on the research we've done, you can't.

Carbon offsetting seems deceptively simple. We know that we in the West need to cut our carbon emissions - the committee on climate change has said 80% by 2050 in the UK. That's going to be expensive and difficult say the naysayers - so here's an idea. Instead of getting rid of, say, coal-fired power stations, why don't we get the people who want to build them - the big energy companies - to pay for the carbon they're going to emit to be saved somewhere else?

You actually helped stop deforestation in the Amazon. Good work.

Posted by christian - 16 October 2009 at 10:51am - Comments

Ever feel powerless? Worried that the problem is too big? Worried that you can't have an impact?

(Timberland are a big shoe company who, after being told to sort out their supply chain by you lot, helped us put pressure on big cattle companies to stop their businesses destroying the Amazon rainforest. This guy is their CEO.)

Case for coal crumbles as Kingsnorth is shelved

Posted by christian - 8 October 2009 at 9:36am - Comments

How do you measure success? Many times, it’s difficult to point to one specific moment when a campaign delivers a big moment that demonstrates, beyond any doubt, that you've succeeded.

Well, our thanks go to E.ON for providing that moment for our coal campaign late last night – just as we were leaving the office, in fact. On my way to the pub, I met a press officer running back towards the front door – "E.ON have shelved Kingsnorth – just got to go and check if it's real, see you in a few…"

He never made it to the pub, because as the evening unfolded it became clear that E.ON were, indeed, after a three year public campaign, kicking their plans for the massively controversial coal plant into the long grass – which would have been the first to be built in Britain since Drax was completed more than 20 years ago.

Another amazing success in our Amazon cattle campaign

Posted by christian - 5 October 2009 at 5:32pm - Comments

Cattle ranched on deforested areas of the Amazon. There's going to be less of this, thanks to you

In what our executive director is calling "a significant victory in the fight to save the Amazon," four of the largest cattle companies in the world are joining forces to ban the purchase of cattle from areas of cleared rainforest in Brazil.

This success is the culmination of our Slaughtering The Amazon campaign, which began back in June. The report which launched the campaign showed that cattle ranching is the single biggest driver of deforestation in the Amazon, and that four-fifths of the areas that have been deforested now have cattle on them.

New report: Climate change will destroy the economy of most of the countries in the world

Posted by christian - 2 October 2009 at 4:49pm - Comments

A new report on the costs of adapting to climate change is a wake-up call to the rich world

There's a curious irony at the heart of climate change. We, that is, the rich countries, have largely caused the problem. But we aren't the one who are going to suffer the most because of it.

In fact, one of the main reasons we are as rich as we are is because we have burnt the most fossil fuels. Britain, for example, was the home of the largely-coal-powered Industrial revolution, and because we got an early lead on burning coal, we are not only relatively well off, we also lead the world in historical emissions. In total, throughout history, the British have emitted more carbon per head of population than anyone else.

Send an SOS to the world over rainforests

Posted by christian - 2 October 2009 at 10:48am - Comments

Deforestation account for about one-fifth of human-caused greenhouse gas emissions. And the way things are going, we need to halt deforestation to give us the best chance of fighting dangerous climate change.

In particular, we have to change the social and economic systems that are driving the destruction of rainforest around the world. That's why one vitally important part of the Copenhagen talks in December - where delegates from all the governments of the world will gather to try and agree a global deal to cut emissions - will be about what's called 'REDD' - or policies to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation, as it's known.

(Some) CO2 emissions have peaked, and emissions regulation is working

Posted by christian - 23 September 2009 at 3:19pm - Comments

With the economy stumbling, emissions are falling. Is this the moment of opportunity to take a deep breath and cut them for good?

In pretty big news, the FT have seen an early extract of an International Energy Agency report which says that due to the global recession, emissions of carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels are now actually falling.

We'll have to wait for the full report for the numbers, but since the start of the economic crisis emissions have undergone "a significant decline," says the IEA.

Video: Measuring the decline of the Arctic Sea Ice

Posted by christian - 21 September 2009 at 3:22pm - Comments

Dr Peter Wadhams, of the Unviersity of Cambridge, is leading a team of five independent scientists investigating the Arctic sea ice from our ship the MV Arctic Sunrise.

Arctic melts away as sea ice likely to be declared third lowest on record

Posted by christian - 17 September 2009 at 1:47pm - Comments

Scientists aboard our ship the MV Arctic Sunrise measure the thickness of the Arctic sea ice.

Today we're expecting an announcement from the National Snow and Ice Data Centre - the US body that monitors the Arctic - about the 'seasonal low' of Arctic sea ice for 2009.

Every year, the Arctic sea ice - the floating cap of frozen ocean that sits over the north of the planet - shrinks and grows with the seasons. In the Arctic summer it melts away and gets smaller, in winter it grows and get bigger. It being mid-September we've just passed the height of Arctic summer, and today the NSIDC will tell us how small the ice cap got this year.

Trafigura settle over toxic dumping after Greenpeace investigation, Guardian expose, and 15 deaths

Posted by christian - 17 September 2009 at 12:23pm - Comments

Greenpeace activists confront the tanker full of toxic sludge.

It reads a little bit like a John Grisham novel. An oil trading company at the heart of the city of London comes up with an innovative way to make massive profits by refining dirty gasoline. Only problem is, the process will produce a highly toxic sludge that is difficult to dispose of. Sure, they could pay an expensive fee to get it done in Rotterdam, but profits can be kept even higher by doing the dirty and dumping the caustic sludge in the city of Abidjan in the Ivory Coast, West Africa.

It's a plan designed to squeeze every last drop of money out of a dirty deal. But then the local population starts to suffer horrendous health effects, presumably from the toxic waste which has been dumped next to homes and workplaces. Whole areas of the city are evacuated, 15 people die, many more are permanently disfigured. People beseige health clinics demanding treatment.

Follow Greenpeace UK