Email Print

Leaked legal documents say the government is open to challenges over new nuclear power

The government would have you believe that all is well in the world of nuclear power. That the path to building more of them in the UK is smooth and care-free.

It isn't. We know this because we're keeping a keen eye on the whole process. A very keen eye. And Greenpeace investigations have exposed that the path is not as smooth as the government will have you believe.

Legal advice from top lawyers says that the government's nuclear plans are open to a number of challenges, on a number of fronts, over a number of years.

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

Leaked documents: Legal advice to the government on new nuclear power

Publication Date: 
17 Nov 2008
Body: 

We've got our hands on a legal document that "explores the processes of consultation and policy development that are under way in the UK with the purpose of creating a national nuclear policy statement and smoothing the way for the provate sector to develop new nuclear power station capacity."

Looks like the government's plans are open to a number of challenges, on a number of fronts, over a number of years. Interesting reading if you're into this sort of thing.

Email Print

The nuclear White Paper: an analysis

Our political unit has been trawling through the fine print of this morning's nuclear White Paper. Here's their initial analysis, outlining some of the more subtle ways the government has understated the real risks to the taxpayer and the lack of clarity on economics:

 

  • The White Paper shows how nuclear companies will be able to cap their liabilities, leaving the tax payer exposed if estimates for dealing with waste change.
  • It openly admits the government will have to provide extra money if cost estimates are wrong.
  • It uses questionable financial estimates to build the nuclear economic case.
Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

Government small print promises nuclear bailout

10 Jan 2008

Buried in the nuclear white paper published today is a commitment by the government to bail out nuclear power if something goes wrong.

Reacting, Greenpeace executive director John Sauven said:

"After all the promises from ministers that the private sector would pay the full costs of new nuclear power stations, we find it wasn't true. Buried in the small print of their announcement is the revelation that tax payers will foot the bill if something goes wrong. Much about the government's nuclear spin has been fundamentally dishonest."

Paragrph 3.52 of the white paper states: "Our policy on waste and decommissioning for new nuclear power stations is designed to ensure that operators make adequate arrangements to cover the full costs of decommissioning and a full share of waste management costs. Operators are responsible for decommissioning and waste management costs. If the protections we are putting in place through the Energy Bill prove insufficient, in extreme circumstances the Government may be called upon to meet the costs of ensuring the protection of the public and the environment."

For more information, contact Greenpeace on 0207 865 8255.

Email Print

Mind the gap

Mind the Gap

On Tuesday, Gordon Brown announced his government’s support for a new generation of nuclear power plants. In so doing, he casts himself in the role of the bold leader, taking tough decisions for the common good.

Certainly The Sun has bought it wholesale, shrieking: ‘Britain’s security will be in peril if we continue to rely on Russian despot Vladimir Putin or Middle Eastern states for our gas and oil.’

Read more »

Tags:
Email Print

20% renewables by 2020? Not without a new energy policy...

Bad energy: inefficient centralised energy generation is a major contributor to global warming

Bad energy: inefficient centralised energy generation is a major contributor to global warming

Over the next decade, Britain needs to invest tens of billions on renewing its dilapidated energy infrastructure. Many of our current nuclear, coal and gas power stations will close, and the electricity transmission and distribution grids themselves will need replacement.

Which provides us with a once-in-a-generation chance for the government to redesign our energy market. We have the perfect opportunity to go for maximum environmental efficiency, whilst ensuring energy security and reliability of supply.

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

Why Tony Blair is wrong about nuclear power

Melting ice

Today, the government has finally published its energy white paper. After last year's energy consultation was ruled "seriously flawed", "misleading" and "manifestly inadequate and unfair" by a High Court Judge, this white paper outlines a new energy policy - and a new nuclear consultation.

Yep, despite a few ineffectual concessions to renewables and efficiency, Tony Blair is still busily spinning the nuclear industry's line: that nuclear power is the answer to climate change. And we still think he's dangerously wrong.

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

Greenpeace on Planning White Paper

21 May 2007

Reacting to the publication by Ruth Kelly of a Planning White Paper, Greenpeace Director John Sauven said:

“The government wants to give the rubber stamp to the wrong projects. Ministers are diluting democracy and saying they know best, but a glance at their performance on climate change over the last decade shows how wrong they often are. This White Paper is clearly intended to open the door to new nuclear power stations and airports, which will take the UK’s fight against climate change backwards. Given the urgency of the problem, this White Paper should have supported low carbon and renewable energy technologies that are of benefit to both local communities and the wider environment and could be generating clean energy in the near future.”

This week will see the publication of an Energy White Paper, delayed following a successful Greenpeace judicial review. For a full media briefing on the Energy White Paper see:

www.greenpeace.org.uk/energyreview

ENDS

For more contact Greenpeace on 0207 865 8255.

 

Email Print

Energy white paper to be published

18 May 2007

In February, a High Court judge described Tony Blair’s energy review as "seriously flawed", "misleading" and "manifestly inadequate and unfair". Mr Justice Sullivan ruled in favour of Greenpeace - which had brought a judicial review - declaring the energy review process unlawful.

As a result, the government's 2007 Energy White Paper - intended for publication in March - was delayed. Next week a series of documents, including the white paper, will be published.

ON MONDAY a planning white paper will be published. It will detail government proposals to loosen planning regulations, allowing new nuclear power stations and airport expansion to go ahead in the face of public opposition.

ON WEDNESDAY it is expected that the energy white paper will be published. On the same day, details of a new nuclear consultation will be revealed. The new consultation became necessary after the original process was found by the High Court to have been unlawful. Greenpeace claimed the first consultation was a "stitch-up" by Tony Blair, designed to foist new nuclear power stations on the UK. It is also believed that a government nuclear siting report could be released on Wednesday. The report, detailing where the government would like to see new nuclear power stations built, was refused to Greenpeace under a Freedom of Information Act request.

A full media briefing on the successful Greenpeace judicial review, the process leading up to next week and the fundamental flaws in next week's announcements can be downloaded here:

www.greenpeace.org.uk/energybriefing

Anticipating next week’s publications, Greenpeace Director John Sauven said:

"Planning, by definition, is supposed to be a vision of the future. Given the urgency of climate change, this Planning White Paper should support low carbon and renewable energy technologies that are of benefit to both local communities and the wider environment. Instead it is clearly intended to open the door to new nuclear power stations and airports which are simply not the answer to the huge challenges we face."


On the Energy White Paper, he added:

"Reaching for nuclear power to fight climate change is like a couch potato taking up smoking to lose weight. It doesn’t deal with the problem, wastes money better spent elsewhere and brings huge problems of its own. That’s why Tony Blair had to fix the energy review to get the answer he wanted."

He continued:

"The government's current energy strategy simply won’t put us on a path to delivering the kinds of cuts needed to combat climate change. We need a policy that will completely transform the way energy is consumed and delivered across all sectors rather than piecemeal changes to the existing system. It’s clear that this forthcoming Energy White Paper will not match the commitments the government has made at an EU level for twenty per cent of our energy, which includes electricity, heat and transport, must come from renewable sources by 2020. For electricity, this will mean around thirty-five per cent must come from renewable sources.”

Greenpeace supports building a new fleet of power stations across the country - modern large scale, renewable energy projects as well as ultra-efficient, Combined Heat and Power (CHP) stations rather than the modified 1950s relics the Government is supporting that waste more energy than they produce. Two-thirds of the energy going in to the UK’s centralised power stations is immediately lost in the form of waste heat.

We are confident that if the government carries out a consultation on nuclear power in the coming months and is open minded about the conclusions it will realise that nuclear power will not deliver either energy security or the carbon reductions required by 2020.

The government needs to change the way we use and generate heat and electricity. This requires a transformation rather than tinkering with an old, outdated system.

ENDS

Greenpeace spokespeople are available for interview and analysis.

Contact the Greenpeace press office on:
0207 865 8255



Email Print

Energy white paper 2007

Publication Date: 
18 May 2007
Body: 

In February a High Court judge described Tony Blair's energy review as "seriously flawed", "misleading" and "manifestly inadequate and unfair." Mr Justice Sullivan ruled in favour of Greenpeace - which had brought a judicial review - declaring the energy review process unlawful.

As a result, the Government's 2007 Energy White Paper - intended for publication in March - was delayed. Next week a series of documents, including the White Paper, will be published.

A full media briefing on the successful Greenpeace judicial review, the process leading up to next week and the fundamental flaws in next week's announcements is available below.