Email Print

Now it looks like Néstle are blocking messages from our supporters

Well, we know that Nestle doesn't seem to like criticism. The debacle on their Facebook page makes that pretty obvious.

But it looks like they're actively blocking reasonable, informed criticism of their unsustainable business practices.

Since Wednesday, we've been asking our supporters to email Paul Bulcke, the CEO of the company, politely asking him to clean up Nestle's business practices and stop using unsustainable palm oil that's contributing to the destruction of Indonesia's rainforests.

But from what we can tell, Nestle have been blocking the IP address of our mail delivery software since Werdnesday afternoon. Rather than engage with people's concerns, they decided to try and censor them. Just like they did with comments on their facebook page - just like they tried to do with our Kitkat subvert.

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

'Banned' Kit Kat video struck down, becomes more powerful

Orang-utans protest outside Nestle offices in China

Where to begin?

There's been so much going here over the last 18 hours that I've only now found the time to write an update. Since the last post here, the Kit Kat video which was pulled from Youtube (following a complaint from Nestlé about copyright infringement) was resurrected on Vimeo and has been racking up views like there's no tomorrow - 78,500 as of this moment. Not the shrewdest move Nestlé could have made, and I liked how Canada's Globe & Mail referred to it as "a global game of whack-a-mole".

Didn't Obi-Wan Kenobi say something about being struck down and coming back more powerful than before?

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

Nestle try to censor our advert, get it pulled from Youtube

Youtube pulls Nestle video upon their request

Oops! Pulled from youtube after a 'copyright' complaint from Nestle.

Update: Want to put your own copy of our video on your favourite video sharing site? Download the file now and be our guest! The more copies out there, the more interesting it will be for Nestle.


Dear Nestle's PR department,

Hey! How are you doing? I know that when we highlight the damaging effect your business is having on the Indonesian rainforests, it must be a bit annoying. I hope you understand that we're only trying to get your attention because using unsustainable palm oil in your products is such a very bad thing. You see, we just can't afford to let the Indonesian rainforests go up in smoke to provide land for palm oil plantations.

When you told us that you cared about the problem just as much as us, sure, we had a few reservations.

For one thing, although you said that you'd no longer buy direct from Sinar Mas - the suppliers of unsustainable palm oil from deforested areas of Indonesian rainforest - you made no such promises about buying from people like Cargill who buy palm oil from the same company. Really, if you're buying the same stuff, but via an intermediary, and you're not able to rule out supplies from APP, that’s not enough progress is it?

I started to wonder if you really cared about this issue in the way that you claim to.

But I guess what made me really wonder about whether you really cared was when you had our video pulled off youtube, citing ‘copyright infringement'. Now, I'm not a lawyer, but I reckon that maybe the terms ‘fair use' and ‘parody' might be relevant here.

Hmm, actually now that I think about it for a moment, I don't think you really care about copyright at all. I think you just wanted to stop people seeing the video! That's pretty lame. Seriously, censorship is just so... last century.

I might also point out that we've already been flooded with offers to host the video elsewhere, and that your move has generated even more interest in the issue on the blogosphere and on twitter.

To me, trying to censor our criticism doesn't seem like such a smart PR move. But then, what do I know!

Anyway, hope you're all well!

All the best,

Christian
GPUK Web Team

Watch the ad here: (We stuck it on Vimeo)

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

Quick response from Nestle, but not much to report

Give me a break says the banner near Nestle's Croydon office

You have to hand it to Nestle - they're quick off the mark when it comes to launching a PR offensive, and with orang-utans hanging around (and sometimes off) their premises around the UK and Europe, they've released a statement saying they're dropping contracts with one of the worst palm oil suppliers, Sinar Mas. However, there's a lot they're not talking about and would probably prefer not to talk about.

Where, for instance, is their commitment to cutting out Sinar Mas completely from their supply chain? They may now be cancelling direct contracts with forest trasher Sinar Mas, but SM palm oil will still end up in Nestle factories. Nestle also buys palm oil from third party suppliers like Cargill, and Sinar Mas palm oil still flows through their pipes. Until Nestle can guarantee that none of its other suppliers are buying from Sinar Mas, we're still on.

And there's no mention of their dealings with Asia Pulp and Paper (APP), one Sinar Mas' many subsidiaries. Their pulp and paper for instance, which is used in things like packaging, is also grown in areas of destroyed rainforest, and Nestle have been less than forthcoming about their relationship with APP. Categorical denials of any dealings with APP have suddenly today been replaced with a commitment to an investigation of their supply chain.

So, full marks for being quick off the PR block, but very few points for effort. In the meantime, enjoy our own Kit Kat advert and write to Nestle's CEO to demand a better response. And follow the fun we're having on Twitter.

Update: A few of the eagle-eyed among you spotted an error in the above. I’d said there was no mention of the Sinar Mas subsidiary APP in Nestlé's new statement yesterday, but there was - a claim that they are not buying from this company. However, at the same time as sending us this statement, Nestlé told us in private that they are "investigating" links to APP through their supply chain.

So it was right that company has been less than forthcoming about their relations with APP, but amid the excitement of yesterday, I missed the claim on this issue in Nestlé's statement - sorry for that!

Read more »
Tags:
Email Print

Nestlé and palm oil: the chain of destruction

Nestle, the makers of Kit Kat, are using palm oil from areas of destroyed rainforest, despite being aware that one of their suppliers, Sinar Mas, has a track record of appalling environmental and social practices.

The chain of destruction stretches right around the world, from the forests of Indonesia to the shops and supermarkets of Europe. Watch the animation to find out just where the ingredients for your favourite chocolate bars like Kit Kat come from.

Read more >>

Tags:
Email Print

Kit Kat: give the orang-utan a break

Email Nestlé's CEO Paul Bulcke to demand they stop using palm oil from trashed rainforests

We all like a break, but the orang-utans of Indonesia don't seem to be able to get one. We have new evidence which shows that Nestlé - the makers of Kit Kat - are using palm oil produced in areas where the orang-utans' rainforests once grew. Even worse, the company doesn't seem to care.

So the Greenpeace orang-utans have been despatched to Nestlé head offices in Croydon to let employees know the environmental crimes their company is implicated in, and begin an international campaign to have Nestlé give us all a break. Read more »

Tags:
Email Print

Caught Red Handed: Nestlé, Sinar Mas and palm oil

Publication Date: 
17 Mar 2010
Body: 

Greenpeace has tracked down the palm oil being used in Nestlé products, including Kit Kats, and exposed how they are using palm oil from Indonesia's largest palm oil producer, Sinar Mas. This company is clearing orang-utan habitats and breaking Indonesian law in order to expand production.

Our report provides evidence of how Nestlé's supplier Sinar Mas is destroying Indonesia's last remaining rainforests and the habitat of orang-utans - a species on the brink of extinction.

Email Print

Nestlé and palm oil

Today is the start of international action by Greenpeace to expose Nestlé’s role in the destruction of the last remaining forests and peatlands of Indonesia.

Need more evidence?
Crime file
Slideshow

It's likely that many of you don’t know your employer is involved in destroying these rainforests, so we want to give you this opportunity to find out more about it. After you've read the evidence and watched the slideshow detailing the chain of destruction, if you have any questions or comments, post them below and we'll answer them.

And come back here at 11am to see the global premiere of Nestlé's new Kit Kat advertising campaign... or at least the one we think it should be.

Email Print

On the front line of deforestation - Sarah's video blog from the Congo

I'm in the Congo, on the first anniversary of our newest Greenpeace office opening here. Read more »

Tags:
Email Print

William Hague speech on climate change and foreign policy - Greenpeace response

25 Nov 2009

Reacting to Shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague's speech on climate change and foreign policy today, Greenpeace Executive Director John Sauven said:

"The fact that William Hague has recognised climate change as one of the top issues affecting British foreign policy is significant, especially in the run up to a general election.

"Global warming carries dangerous consequences not only for foreign governments but for British interests at home and abroad. The Conservative party must now show that it is prepared to put the issue at the heart of its decision making, and show the determination and boldness to tackle the problem head on."

Quotes on specific areas of the speech:

EU emissions cuts

John Sauven said:

"William Hague concedes that the EU needs a more ambitious target to reduce emissions, but then claims we need to wait for a global deal before announcing it. Given the urgency of the problem and the diplomatic stalemate we face it's vitally important that he backs a 30% target right now, to show the rest of the world that the EU is serious about tackling climate change".

Note:

Hague commits to "moving to a 30% emissions reduction target by 2020 on 1990 levels when a legally binding treaty is agreed". This would simply echo the current EU position. To show real leadership the Conservative party should back calls to increase the target now.

Reform of the EU budget

John Sauven said:

"Making climate change a priority within the EU budget makes sense, because at the moment the high rhetoric of European politicians is rarely reflected in their spending commitments. But this process could take years, and Hague needs to recognise that Britain must commit funding right now to tackle urgent problems like deforestation and climate adaptation."

Note:

The shadow foreign secretary suggests that "There are strong arguments for the EU to make a single global offer channelling such funding through the EU budget, as the best and most constructive way forward."

Set against Hague's criticism of the EU should be the fact that it has been instrumental in encouraging countries including the UK to commit to emission reductions, and has played a significant role in promoting the renewable energy industry across the continent. However, politicians have failed to put their money where their mouths are, especially considering the number of speeches devoted to climate change by European leaders.

Funding for forest protection

John Sauven said:

"William Hague is right to recognise that the market will not deliver cash to protect forests before 2020, and that public funding is needed now. The UK must commit a substantial level of money immediately, because without this there may be no forest left to protect in the future."

Notes:

A report from an international group, co-chaired by the UK government and called 'The Informal Working Group on Interim Finance for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation' recently estimated that if financing of €15-25 billion were made available between 2010-15, global deforestation rates could be cut by 25%, or 7Gt of carbon dioxide equivalent. (1)

Illegal Timber

John Sauven said:

"The EU has moved too slowly to ban the importation of illegal timber into the UK, so the Conservative proposal to introduce UK legislation is welcome news. We must now make sure that any new law requires companies to prove the origin of the wood they use and is tough enough to take meaningful action against those that break the rules."

Notes:

Illegal timber remains a significant problem in the European and UK markets. New EU regulations will improve the situation but the timetable for their introduction is proving to be slower and overall strength weaker than had been hoped. A complete solution to the problem of illegal timber requires effective Europe-wide laws. In the absence of a complete European response and subject to the detail, the proposals announced by William Hague signal a step in the right direction.

Greenpeace background document: www.greenpeace.org.uk/forests/destructive-and-illegal-logging

FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE GREENPEACE PRESS OFFICE ON 0207 865 8255

FOOTNOTES

(1) www.rainforestsos.org/page/-/pages/pdfs/IWG-IFR-Summary_final_ENGLISH.pdf