Blogposts tagged 'John Sauven'

Geoff Hoon's arguments for why expanding Heathrow won't be an environmental disaster are rather shaky, to say the least. 'Green planes', 'strict oversight', 'a strong business case for expansion' - unfortunately it's all just greenwash of the highest order. In the real world, we know a third runway would lead to more pollution, faster climate change and, according to WDM, about the same annual emissions as Kenya.

John, our executive director, did a good job of demolishing the government's case on Channel 4 News last night - check it out:

Today's G8 announcements on climate change set the bar too low, writes Greenpeace's John Sauven for Comment is free.

The informal annual gathering of the world's most powerful leaders emerged after the oil crisis and the subsequent recession in the 1970s. The vested interests of this group in the global economy and access to the world's resources are obvious. The eight countries now forming the group represent between them the bulk of the world's economic activity; they also own most of the world's firepower and consume most of the world's resources.

Energy minister John Hutton has been caught trying to sabotage the EU renewable energy targets again. A minister from Hutton's department has been working in Brussels to try and redefine what constitutes 'renewable energy.' After last year's fiasco when Hutton’s department were seen trying to wreck EU renewable targets altogether, now the business minister Lady Vadera has been filmed trying to water them down at an EU energy council meeting.

Gordon Brown's public consultation on nuclear power is being fixed by the market research company carrying out the polling.

Dr Paul Dorfman, a senior research fellow at the National Centre for Involvement at the University of Warwick, told the Guardian that the questions being asked in the consultation were deliberately skewed to get a thumbs up for nuclear power by massively overplaying its role in tackling climate change - because the government knew this was the only way they could ever get people to accept new nuclear power.

According to Dr Dorfman, "partial information was rammed down the public's throat. It was totally impractical for people to make a rational decision based on the information they were fed. The way it was put together was designed so that a particular view would emerge."