What you can do
- Tell world leaders Copenhagen wasn't good enough for the climate
- Call for an end to investment in Trident
- Design an activist stronghold to stop the third runway at Heathrow
- Tell your MP to change the politics and save the climate
- Become a member of Airplot and stand in the way of a third runway
- Make a donation - we can't do it without your help
TAKE ACTION
April 2009 - the month in pictures
Posted by jossc on 1 May 2009.

Stunning images of climate change protests from North and South America, Europe and Asia make up the core of this month's contributions. It's been a busy time for reminding governments what they should already know by now - that we have to wean ourselves of climate-wrecking fossil fuels as soon as possible, and the business as usual is not an option.
Oh, and in case your wondering about picture number 9, we really did project on to the reactor sarcophagus at Chernobyl - though even I'll admit that the end result could easily be mistaken for a quick bit of Photoshop work!
Read more »Impact of Japan's nuclear accident
Posted by bex on 31 July 2007.
Reuters has a new video report on the impacts of earthquake-struck Japan's recent nuclear accident, which means Kawashaki nuclear plant will be closed indefinitely:
Japan's killer earthquake left its biggest nuclear power company facing financial losses, supply questions, and demands for greater safety.
The video's here (there's an advert before the Reuters report starts).
Kashiwazaki nuclear plant - report from the scene
Posted by bex on 24 July 2007.
After the conflicting reports about last week's earthquake in Japan, a Greenpeace team of nuclear and radiation experts headed over to Japan to check radiation levels on the ground.
Happily, most places the team checked around the plant didn't show signs of increased radioactivity, but they had a couple of bizarre moments along the way. Their diaries are on our international site.
Japan's nuclear leak: earthquakes, fire and fault lines
Posted by bex on 19 July 2007.
On Monday, an earthquake hit Kashiwazaki in north-western Japan, killing nine people and injuring hundreds more. Already a disaster for the citizens of Kashiwazaki, thousands of whom are now living in shelters, things could have been much, much worse.
Kawashaki is the location of the world’s biggest nuclear power plant – the site of seven nuclear reactors. At first it was thought that the 6.8 magnitude earthquake had just caused a fire at the plant and Tepco – the nuclear company - initially said no radioactivity was released. "No harm" was done, said a spokesperson.
Then we were told that in fact there had been a leak, but it was only 1.5 gallons of radioactive water. On Tuesday, it emerged that just a smidgen more radioactive water might have leaked than 1.5 gallons. About 243 times more. And the water was 50 times more radioactive than had been stated.
Read more »British Nuclear Group court case - transcript and sentence
The case, brought by the Health and Safety Executive (North West) centred on the events that led up to 83,000 litres of highly radioactive dissolved spent fuel leaking into the area beneath a tank in the reprocessing facility.
As the case revealed, the leak - which went undetected for eight months - was the result of a succession of operator and technical failures going back to the late 1990s.
The judge sentenced British Nuclear Group to pay £500,000 in fines and costs of almost £70,000. It is the largest ever fine imposed on Bitish Nuclear Group (this was not its first prosecution).
The £2.5bn plant, which was closed in April 2005 for repairs, is not expected to re-open until January 2007 - if then. Estimates of the financial losses - due to the closure - to the government's Nuclear Decommissioned Authority, which owns THORP, stand at between £60m-£400m.
What we made: a nuclear wasteland
Posted by bex on 26 September 2006.
London rapper Example doesn't just take his music to the edge - he also takes it to deserted, radioactively contaminated post-nuclear zones. Now he's released a documentary about his journey to Chernobyl, explaining why he thinks the future shouldn't be nuclear.
"I don't think anyone who's been here can be for nuclear power," says rapper Example, looking around at empty cots and babies' gas masks in a disintegrating schoolroom near Chernobyl.
"I've read stuff recently about how we're only ever going to survive if we make nuclear power available, but you just think: why would you want it to happen after seeing this?"
Example went to Chernobyl to film a promo video for his new track, What We Made:
Sweden closes nuclear plants over safety fears
Posted by bex on 4 August 2006.

forsmark nuclear power plant in Sweden
"It was pure luck there wasn't a meltdown," said a former director of Forsmark nuclear power plant after a serious incident at that plant last week. Now Sweden has shut down four of its 10 nuclear plants after faults were discovered. And a generator failure like Sweden's could easily happen in the UK.
A bad month for Blair
Posted by bex on 5 July 2006.

Radioactive champagne, near nuclear meltdowns, leaked terrorism documents and a nuclear waste train crash... In the same month that Tony Blair announced nuclear power was "back on the agenda with a vengeance", events in the real world put the lie to nuclear industry spin.
Read more »Assessment of the operational risks and hazards of the EPR when subject to aircraft crash
A brief review of a confidential leaked EdF document
Summary
This is a brief review of a confidential EdF document that has been leaked to the public domain in France.
The EdF document relates to the projected performance of the AREVA designed Generation III EPR reactor. The first of this reactor type is presently being built at Olkiluoto in Finland and construction of a second EPR is expected to commence shortly at the established nuclear power station site at Flamanville in France.
In or about 2003 it seems that EdF prepared a statement to the Direction Générale de la Sureté Nucléaire et de la Radioprotection in response to its request to demonstrate the safety of the EPR design against the deliberate crashing of a large civil aircraft onto the nuclear island. The resulting EdF document endeavours to prove the ability of the plant to withstand such attack and it claims to do so by comparing the footprint and time sequencing of the impact of a small military (fighter) aircraft to that of a large, fully fuelled commercial airliner.
However, this leaked EdF document shows the claim to be flawed in a number of important respects: First, in that the impact signatures of the small military fighter and very much larger commercial passenger aircraft are unlikely, contrary to the reckoning of EdF, to be sufficiently similar in both time span and magnitude for the design resistance of the EPR to an accidental military aircraft strike to equally apply to a passenger airliner intentionally targeted the nuclear island of the plant - indeed, the basis of reckoning the resistance of the built structures is so grossly simplified that it is inapplicable to a real impact situation.
Second, the EdF assumption that the 100 or more tonnes of aviation fuel spilt during the moment of impact would ignite and burn itself out within 2 minutes or so is entirely without justification and unproven, with there being a good possibility that highly explosive vapour would be formed within and around the structures, the deflagration of which could be severely damaging to the EPR building structures and nuclear equipment within. And, quite incredibly, one line of mitigation proposed by EdF is that the terrorist would have insufficient skills to pilot the aircraft onto the intended target, this being quite contrary to the dedicated training undertaken by the terrorists who masterminded the 9/11 attacks.



