Search
GP Worldwide
RSS
Creative Commons
TAKE ACTION
Latest news
World Bank forest protection scheme announced at Bali
Responding to the news that the UK government is set to commit £15m to a World Bank scheme which aims to reduce tropical deforestation, John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace UK said:
"It would be unthinkable for the next phase of the Kyoto protocol not to address tropical deforestation, which is one of the biggest drivers of climate change. But world leaders can't use this as an excuse to avoid slashing emissions in their own countries - we urgently need to do both.
"What's more, our government should think twice before pumping more money into the coffers of the World Bank, which has a poor track record when it comes to illegal logging. We need an agreement which benefits indigenous forest communities around the world."
The bank's Forest Carbon Partnership Facility was unveiled today in Bali. The bank has set a target of $300 million overall for the facility - the UK's capital contribution represents 10 per cent of the overall target.
The World Bank stands accused of failing to tackle uncontrolled industrial logging in the Democratic Republic of Congo. A Greenpeace report, released earlier this year and entitled "Carving up the Congo" shows how the emphasis placed on logging as a means of developing local economies has undermined the bank's stated position as a protector of tropical forests.
For the full report visit www.greenpeace.org.uk/media/reports/carving-up-the-congo
For more contact Greenpeace on 0207 865 8255
ENDS:
NOTES
- Indonesia and Brazil are the third and fourth largest global CO2 emitters because of the clearing of their rainforests for commodities like timber, palm oil and soya. Dealing with deforestation and emissions on this scale requires a well-funded, well-thought out, global approach.
- Since 1997 about 13 million hectares of forest (mostly tropical) have been destroyed per year - an area the size of Greece lost every year.
- Greenpeace has proposed an international mechanism (TDERM), to be overseen by the United Nations; it has the potential to raise funding in the range of several billion US$ per year to finance urgent action to cut emissions from deforestation.
- The proposal would allow industrialised countries like Britain to meet a percentage of their emissions reduction targets through the purchase of "units" from the scheme. Proceeds from the sale of these units would be used to transfer resources between rich countries and poor ones to prevent deforestation.
- Any such scheme has to guarantee the participation of the indigenous people of forest countries, and to make sure that they benefit from any transfer of resources from the North to South.
World Bank ditches shares in Congo-trashing company
Posted by jamie on 10 December 2007.
There have been some great developments around our Congo rainforest campaign, as the FT reported on its website this morning that one of the arms of the World Bank will offload the shares it owns in a company known to be destroying the forest of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
The International Finance Corporation (IFC) has announced that it will divest its holdings in Olam International, a Singapore-based company which has operations in the DRC. The Congo report we released earlier this year showed how Olam was holding forest land granted in breach of the current moratorium which the World Bank itself helped establish and that it was also trading in dodgy timber. As a result, Olam has since given back its forest holdings to the DRC government, but it still buys illegal timber cut by local companies.
Read more »World Bank Group finances company involved in the illegal destruction of the Congo rainforest
The World Bank's International Finance Corporation (IFC) is financing a Singapore-based trading group, Olam International Ltd, which has been involved in trading illegal timber in the rainforest of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The world's 'local bank', HSBC, is also providing financial services to the company, in breach of its environmental policy. Olam is today expected to report much improved profits in its half yearly financial results.
Nearly three weeks ago, the DRC provincial authorities seized illegal timber shipments from Olam International in the remote province of Bandundu. The area's Forestry Minister, Coco Pembe, accused the company of trading illegal timber, cut by local companies whose logging permits have expired.
These seizures of illegal timber follow revelations in Greenpeace's report earlier this year 'Carving Up the Congo' showing that in 2005, Olam was awarded three logging titles covering over 300,000 hectares, in violation of a 2002 moratorium which was supposed to stop the allocation of new logging titles in the DRC. Whilst Olam claims to have since handed back one title, the other two are subject to a legal review expected to report later this year. The report also revealed that Olam trades in timber from third parties whose destructive logging operations cause social conflicts, massive environmental damage and significant loss or state revenue.(1)
Olam is funded by the World Bank Group, whilst HSBC and Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) are providing financial services to the company.
In December 2003, the IFC invested US$15 million in Olam and during 2004, a partial guarantee of a further $US50 million was also approved.(2) As of Fiscal Year 2006, the IFC held US$11.2 million in Olam loans and guarantees.(3) Despite this, the World Bank denies any IFC involvement in the DRC forest sector, stating on its website that "the Bank does not fund logging anywhere in Africa and our main advice to the Government of DRC is not to expand industrial logging". (4)
Forest campaigner Sarah Shoraka said, "This is an example of the World Bank's appalling double standards. While the left hand of the Bank claims to be saving the Congo rainforest, its right hand is helping finance its destruction. Rather than financing the plunder of the world's second largest rainforest, the World Bank should invest in strengthening forest law enforcement in the DRC, to control the wanton and illegal destruction being perpetrated by logging companies."
HSBC and Royal Bank of Scotland are two of Olam's principle bankers.(5) HSBC's forest sector guidelines prohibit it from providing financial assistance for commercial logging operations in "primary tropical moist forest" or in "violation of local or national laws in respect of illegal logging". The company claims to only support customers in this sector that are operating forests moving towards certification by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC).(6) RBS does not even have a policy in regard to this.
Shoraka continued: "HSBC and RBS should stop facilitating the carve up of the Congo by cutting all links with Olam immediately."
Olam's operations have already faced legal issues elsewhere in Africa, and in 2004 it was fined $20,000 by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission for illegal practices in the US market.(7)
The Congo forest is the world's second largest rainforest after the Amazon. In the DRC alone, an estimated 40 million people depend on the forests for their livelihoods. Greenpeace is calling for the cancellation of all logging titles issued since May 2002 and for the moratorium on new logging titles to be extended and enforced until the sector is under control and a land-use plan that includes the participation of local communities is fully in place.
Contact: Greenpeace Press Office on 0207 865 8115
NOTES TO EDITOR
1. The Greenpeace report 'Carving Up The Congo' can be downloaded at http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/media/reports/carving-up-the-congo
2. IFC Summary of Project Information, project numbers 20929 and 22659
3. IFC, letter to Greenpeace, July 31, 2007
4. World Bank website
5. http://www.listedcompany.com/ir/Olam/misc/Olam_ar2006.pdf (page 69)
6. HSBC Forest Land and Forest Products Sector Guidelines (pdf)
7. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Release 4914-04 (CFTC Docket No. 04-13)
How the World Bank and HSBC are investing in deforestation
Posted by jamie on 29 August 2007.
Back in April, at the World Bank's spring meeting, there was much talk about the plight of the Congo rainforest. We'd just published a big report detailing how in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) logging titles were being granted in breach of a moratorium that the bank had been instrumental in establishing. The report launch was so high profile, we were able to force DRC's rainforest high onto the agenda of the World Bank meeting and have also managed to secure another session at the upcoming autumn meeting.
Read more »Congo timber ship blocked
Posted by jamie on 6 July 2007.

Right now, a group of Greenpeace climbers are perched on top of a set of cranes in the port of La Rochelle on the French Atlantic coast. They've been there since Wednesday night and as well as admiring a no-doubt magnificent view, they're also preventing a ship unloading its cargo of timber which has come from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
Read more »What you can do to help protect the Congo rainforest
We need your help to protect the Congo rainforest. It's the second largest rainforest on Earth (only the Amazon is bigger), supporting millions of people as well as being stuffed full of unique and engandered species, including gorillas, chimpanzees and bonobos. And like all large forests, it is crucially important for regulating the local and global climate.
Documentary evidence from the Congo
Posted by jamie on 30 May 2007.
If the testimonies of our two Congolese visitors weren't enough to convince you that there's trouble of the arboreal variety brewing in the Democratic Republic of Congo, try this film for size.
Read more »Caterpillars and contracts: first-hand reports from the Congo rainforest
Posted by jamie on 21 May 2007.

Adrien Sinafasi Makelo (left) and René Ngongo (right) address MPs, civil servants and campaigners
On Thursday, I found myself at Portcullis House, an imposing edifice that sits across the road from the main Houses of Parliament building. The occasion was a panel discussion hosted by Greenpeace and (deep breath) the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on the Great Lakes Region of Africa, to discuss the crisis in the Congo rainforest. As the name suggests, it's a collective of MPs from all parties with a special interest in that part of the world who try to make sure issues affecting the region remain on the political agenda.
Read more »When is a moratorium not a moratorium?
Posted by jamie on 4 May 2007.

Forest officials in the Democratic Republic of Congo are woefully under-resourced
It's not a trick question, and the answer is simple: when a moratorium is failing to stop the problem it was originally designed to address, then it's not much of a moratorium at all. There's one in place right now in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) that is supposed to help prevent the destruction of the country's rainforest, and yet it has been repeatedly breached until the moratorium itself is practically worthless.
Read more »Chewing over the Congo with the World Bank
Posted by jamie on 19 April 2007.

Our report on the con in the Congo really did catch the attention of the World Bank. They were referenced many, many times in its pages and have taken a keen interest in what we have to say about their role in the destruction of the African rainforest at the hands of the international logging companies.
Such is their interest that a special event was held at the spring meeting in Washington DC last weekend - even though it was in the offing before we released the report, it wasn't on the official agenda and was held as a direct result of the work done by ourselves and other organisations, both globally and in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) over the last few weeks.
Read more »

